1664
Comments (65)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
AngryWriter 9 points ago +12 / -3

It's called having aligned interests. If you have kids, you have an inherent bias towards having a long term stable and successful country. If you don't have kids, you might not give a shit what happens in the long term because you won't be around for it.

5
yoohoo 5 points ago +5 / -0

A childless person can still serve as a parental figure to or foster parent of others and leave behind an enduring legacy regardless. It's more accurate to say a selfish person makes a poor leader while a selfless one makes an awesome leader. Also it matters more what spiritual quality of kids you raise over the physical quantity of them.

3
AngryWriter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Counterpoint, you can easily determine whether or not someone has children. Determinating whether or not someone is truly selfish is pretty much impossible with any certainty.

1
yoohoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

True, it's not with 100% certainty; people are complicated beings. That why I said "more accurate". However, some people could be really good at hiding that they have kids from other people. Example: Bob's in a relationship (or married) with no kids...but Bob has a secret family with kids with another lover (or spouse) on the side.