3566
Comments (75)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
mrxforsenate19909902 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's the issue. The States where the fraud took place all set precedents. They all decided to cheat to get their guy in and this was allowed to happen at a State level to determine the head of the Federal level. We're talking about someone who leads the most powerful military and nation on the planet and thereby violating their own States' election and Constitutional laws they've effectively usurped the rights of the other States who DID NOT want the potato in office. They've effectively nullified the votes of other States who followed their laws and of people who legitimately voted for Trump. I.E. Fuck Rand Paul.

1
yurimodin 1 point ago +1 / -0

"no standing" welcome to clown world.

1
Pablo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. That's why the supreme court's dismal of the Texas lawsuit based on the claim that the certification of other states didn't concern Texas was bullshit because it clearly did. Rand Paul's argument was that if the federal government had complete authority over the election results, that could potentially be more dangerous than allowing a few individual states to try to rig their own state elections. Rand Paul was on the wrong side of the vote in this case but considering that almost every single one of the other people who voted against it gave completely bullshit "Trump incited an insurrection" reasons for their vote, and Rand Paul at least made the decision based on his libertarian principles, I don't think that it would be fair to put him in the same category of traitor as the rest of them.