What parts do you believe are lies? This post has a multitude of statements many of which, to the best of my knowledge, are true statements.
Can you explain how this undermines Trump supporters? Or how these are lies? And even if they are lies, how are lies keeping us complacent? Are we not allowed to hope that the military might actually be in charge?
Because if there was foreign interference in our election, and they colluded with US traitors to rig the election for Biden, then it would be considered an Act of War and the military may, at some point, seize control of the government if they think it is illegitimate.
The statements are true, but the conclusion the writer draws; that action is ongoing, that military tribunals are taking place is pure speculation. This is hope, hope is nice, you can't eat hope.
Okay, to be honest, without someone from the military coming right out and telling us they are in charge, it is difficult to come that conclusion without a lot of hope. But that's the conclusion he makes after analyzing the data points listed.
After reading the data points, what is your conclusion?
Also, what the hell is wrong with hope? People act like we should just give up already, all is lost, Commies took over, we had our chance, we blew it, q kept us complacent, blah blah blah blah
To answer your questions :)
My conclusion is the writers conclusion is unsupported.
Hope without substance to support it leads to inaction, in a time of crisis, inaction is dangerous.
I have not given up, far from it, I want to see a Trump supported plan immediately, if not, a Trump supported successor who will have a plan of action, also immediately.
My conclusion is we are in serious trouble and we need quality leadership and I don't see any stepping forward
What parts do you believe are lies? This post has a multitude of statements many of which, to the best of my knowledge, are true statements.
Can you explain how this undermines Trump supporters? Or how these are lies? And even if they are lies, how are lies keeping us complacent? Are we not allowed to hope that the military might actually be in charge?
Because if there was foreign interference in our election, and they colluded with US traitors to rig the election for Biden, then it would be considered an Act of War and the military may, at some point, seize control of the government if they think it is illegitimate.
The statements are true, but the conclusion the writer draws; that action is ongoing, that military tribunals are taking place is pure speculation. This is hope, hope is nice, you can't eat hope.
Okay, to be honest, without someone from the military coming right out and telling us they are in charge, it is difficult to come that conclusion without a lot of hope. But that's the conclusion he makes after analyzing the data points listed.
After reading the data points, what is your conclusion?
Also, what the hell is wrong with hope? People act like we should just give up already, all is lost, Commies took over, we had our chance, we blew it, q kept us complacent, blah blah blah blah
What are you CONCLUSIONS? What are your hopes?
To answer your questions :) My conclusion is the writers conclusion is unsupported. Hope without substance to support it leads to inaction, in a time of crisis, inaction is dangerous. I have not given up, far from it, I want to see a Trump supported plan immediately, if not, a Trump supported successor who will have a plan of action, also immediately. My conclusion is we are in serious trouble and we need quality leadership and I don't see any stepping forward