Civil disobedience is not peace. Is force by mass numbers. Even if there is no fire shot. Which it was, but lot less mediatizated. There was another violent group acting. Authorities, lost anyway choose to talk with Gandhi. Anyway in that time the regime was a joke respect to population.
Actually, while Gandhi was starving himself, other Indian independence groups were blowing up building and assassinating British dignitaries. He was basically the propaganda face of the movement.
Read some history. Some Monarchies were loved, but commies forced abdications. See Bulgaria, Mecadonia ,Serbia ,Romania,. When we talk commies, nr is not important. 10% can turn the rest of population. Ideology is very tricky on commies.
What corrupt, totalitarian or anti people regime or monarchy were changed by court decisions or in Congress? Peacefully..., In human history...
Yut! Where's our Tun Tavern?
India achieved it's independence from a corrupt totalitarian monarchy through non-violent means. Pedes might want to watch Ghandi.
Civil disobedience is not peace. Is force by mass numbers. Even if there is no fire shot. Which it was, but lot less mediatizated. There was another violent group acting. Authorities, lost anyway choose to talk with Gandhi. Anyway in that time the regime was a joke respect to population.
Actually, while Gandhi was starving himself, other Indian independence groups were blowing up building and assassinating British dignitaries. He was basically the propaganda face of the movement.
No way. I remeber Ghandi in the middle of milions in street.
That's a good line. Cheers
>anti people regime or monarchy
Pick one. Although I doubt simps are capable to grok it...
Read some history. Some Monarchies were loved, but commies forced abdications. See Bulgaria, Mecadonia ,Serbia ,Romania,. When we talk commies, nr is not important. 10% can turn the rest of population. Ideology is very tricky on commies.
>Read some history.
Are you telling me to read some history? It's like a son teaching his father how to fuck.