If anyone in the Senate cared about facts, this wouldn't even go to trial, it would be immediately dismissed. It doesn't matter how bullet proof the case is, the vote will be purely political.
Totally agree its all political, they think Maga Potus had a crowd last time can't wait, and look at all the entertainment value, imagine Potus shows up in person and everything gets laid out. I'm not sure they want to go down that road.
If it is dismissed, which I am unfortunately confident it will be, then Trump loses his best opportunity to make the case for election fraud on the largest international platform imagineable.
I am praying with all my might that it's not dismissed. This is where Trump will clear his name and prove that Joseph R(apist) Briben is a criminal usuper and guilty of conspiring and colluding with many Dems to commit negligent fraud and sedition.
With Kamala Harris presiding over the trial, there is no chance they will give Trump a chance to present his case for election fraud. The dems will narrowly limit all evidence to focus on his one speech at the capital. These people do not respect the law, why would they give a defendant a chance to present their case? Especially when that defendant is President Trump.
First, there are only two charges alleged in this false impeachment. The first is that Trump incited violence by making false claims about the election. The second is the charge of inciting an insurrection. The accused has the right to defend against all charges.
Because it will be an international spectacle the Commies won't want to look like tyrants. To that point, Trump will have to show up personally and run the show in true Trump fashion without interfering with his legal team's presentation of the evidence. If he's there he will rattle the heck out of the commies.
Commie Whore Harris cannot 'preside' over the trial. Only the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can.
You are correct on all counts except one - the dems don't care if they look like tyrants, they already do. The democrat leadership is interested in only two things - power and money. They don't care what law they break or what lies they tell, or what damage they do to the nation as long as it leads to more power and money. They are the ones who have committed treason, they have betrayed their oaths. But so long as they hold their ill gotten power, they will continue on their path of destruction.
And you're right, not only is there no such thing as an impeachment trial for a president who does not currently hold office, but the constitution stipulates it SHALL BE the Chief Justice who presides. Justice Roberts has declined, but they're proceeding anyway, so we can assume this will be a kangaroo court, a propaganda stunt meant to attack conservatives. Nothing that happens will have the force of law though they will declare it does. What's one more lie to these people?
Trump started the wake-up call. All these new exposés will let more and more regular people wake up, till there is nothing the corrupt politicians can do but to sacrifice the worst among them, if they want to be spared themselves.
They are (after changing their claims following info the taking of congress was preplanned) claiming Trump's peddling false fraud allegations stoked 1/6.
IF they go forward with impeachment hearings this could become the master if all red pills.
How many in the public have not heard of the anterim count forensic audit? Or the white hat evidence of foreign interference, or national intelligence foreign countries entered our election systems, or the voluminous number of statistical experts demonstrating theath doesn't like and the election was a fraud?
This could turn into an absolutely epic moment of buyers remorse if played correctly.
This must be part of the calculus. By opening that door, they open that door to everything related. Imagine what happens to the CNN watchers when they find out there is an entire inventory of facts and data showing HOW (not if) the election was tampered with.
The "riot" started simultaneously with Arizona objections and evidence being presented. We had enough senators, house members, and evidence teed up that they were toast.
The so called invasion of the capital was a master stroke to end all of it.
And maybe I'm slightly stretching, but a few of their people running around finding and destroying evidence while there was a bit of panic and confusion, isn't outside the realm of possibility.
Nailed it. This was my take after watching everything unfold on here that day too. I thought it was REALLY fucking strange how everything went down immediately after the objections started and Trump wasn't even finished yet.
I also remember it was a little unsettling to me how the left was so quiet during the buildup to that day. Too silent, almost like they had something planned. This whole thing just plays way too perfectly into their hands.
I never considered the possibility of them using the distraction to destroy and cover up evidence, but knowing what we know now I'd say that most likely happened too.
I just watched this and was surprised at how mediocre her delivery was. She stumbled a lot, barely made eye contact and seemed to struggle to read her speaking notes. She had an iron-clad case but to me, lacked confidence in her delivery which hurt her.
The content is A-1 but it was definitely not a 'masterclass' in presentation.
Agreed. Needs to go to Toastmasters. Memorize the gist, go off an index card, make eye contact, look around the room, simplify the message down to a few points, crush it.
I have not witnessed a counter punch yet that would quantify as "epic".
Still looks like clown world to me. No one is stopping Biden and his faggotry. Everyone at the top that's "supposedly" on our side, appears to be a raging cuck, with the DNC's cum dribbling down their chin.
Repubs don't want the facts out. And since Trump not president, Harris may preside over hearing instead of Robert's. They can do what they want. They have 25,000 troops outside.
Is there going to be an uninterrupted international broadcast? He should have used the EAS to broadcast all of the evidence. But hey🤷♀️ shoulda, woulda, coulda.
Dimocrats control the trial. They will not allow the election to be discussed at all. That is what the trial is about. Saying anything other than the election was 100% legit is an insurrection.
Don’t kid yourself that the major network will feel obligated to bring the entire proceedings to the public. If they’re afraid of facts actually getting out, they’ll just start showing edited summaries. This goes for the cable news channels as well. You’ll probably have to tune in to C-SPAN, or streaming coverage if you want to see the whole thing. And only a small percentage of people will do that. Normies will never see the facts...they’ll just hear that Trump was convicted
If anyone in the Senate cared about facts, this wouldn't even go to trial, it would be immediately dismissed. It doesn't matter how bullet proof the case is, the vote will be purely political.
Can't go backwards in time. The Swamp™ has installed Joepedo and the Toxic Twat.
Time to destroy them and the Pelosi/Commie machine that masterminded this assault on America.
Totally agree its all political, they think Maga Potus had a crowd last time can't wait, and look at all the entertainment value, imagine Potus shows up in person and everything gets laid out. I'm not sure they want to go down that road.
Exactly. The senate will treat facts just like our courts do....they will be ignored.
If it is dismissed, which I am unfortunately confident it will be, then Trump loses his best opportunity to make the case for election fraud on the largest international platform imagineable.
I am praying with all my might that it's not dismissed. This is where Trump will clear his name and prove that Joseph R(apist) Briben is a criminal usuper and guilty of conspiring and colluding with many Dems to commit negligent fraud and sedition.
With Kamala Harris presiding over the trial, there is no chance they will give Trump a chance to present his case for election fraud. The dems will narrowly limit all evidence to focus on his one speech at the capital. These people do not respect the law, why would they give a defendant a chance to present their case? Especially when that defendant is President Trump.
Hi AbsurdOpinion,
Two things:
First, there are only two charges alleged in this false impeachment. The first is that Trump incited violence by making false claims about the election. The second is the charge of inciting an insurrection. The accused has the right to defend against all charges.
Because it will be an international spectacle the Commies won't want to look like tyrants. To that point, Trump will have to show up personally and run the show in true Trump fashion without interfering with his legal team's presentation of the evidence. If he's there he will rattle the heck out of the commies.
Commie Whore Harris cannot 'preside' over the trial. Only the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court can.
You are correct on all counts except one - the dems don't care if they look like tyrants, they already do. The democrat leadership is interested in only two things - power and money. They don't care what law they break or what lies they tell, or what damage they do to the nation as long as it leads to more power and money. They are the ones who have committed treason, they have betrayed their oaths. But so long as they hold their ill gotten power, they will continue on their path of destruction.
And you're right, not only is there no such thing as an impeachment trial for a president who does not currently hold office, but the constitution stipulates it SHALL BE the Chief Justice who presides. Justice Roberts has declined, but they're proceeding anyway, so we can assume this will be a kangaroo court, a propaganda stunt meant to attack conservatives. Nothing that happens will have the force of law though they will declare it does. What's one more lie to these people?
Hence, the reason why Trump needs to be there in person to manage the 'show'.
Trump started the wake-up call. All these new exposés will let more and more regular people wake up, till there is nothing the corrupt politicians can do but to sacrifice the worst among them, if they want to be spared themselves.
She doesn't want to help Trump this time. Never forget that.
What, why?
I don't know because she sucks.
Yes, and now we know it’s all Theatre
They are (after changing their claims following info the taking of congress was preplanned) claiming Trump's peddling false fraud allegations stoked 1/6.
IF they go forward with impeachment hearings this could become the master if all red pills.
How many in the public have not heard of the anterim count forensic audit? Or the white hat evidence of foreign interference, or national intelligence foreign countries entered our election systems, or the voluminous number of statistical experts demonstrating theath doesn't like and the election was a fraud?
This could turn into an absolutely epic moment of buyers remorse if played correctly.
This must be part of the calculus. By opening that door, they open that door to everything related. Imagine what happens to the CNN watchers when they find out there is an entire inventory of facts and data showing HOW (not if) the election was tampered with.
We tried that on the sixth.
What fun events do they have planned to disrupt this one?
We didn't really since only politicians had a say.
The "riot" started simultaneously with Arizona objections and evidence being presented. We had enough senators, house members, and evidence teed up that they were toast.
The so called invasion of the capital was a master stroke to end all of it.
And maybe I'm slightly stretching, but a few of their people running around finding and destroying evidence while there was a bit of panic and confusion, isn't outside the realm of possibility.
Nailed it. This was my take after watching everything unfold on here that day too. I thought it was REALLY fucking strange how everything went down immediately after the objections started and Trump wasn't even finished yet.
I also remember it was a little unsettling to me how the left was so quiet during the buildup to that day. Too silent, almost like they had something planned. This whole thing just plays way too perfectly into their hands.
I never considered the possibility of them using the distraction to destroy and cover up evidence, but knowing what we know now I'd say that most likely happened too.
Agreed, NadlerShartWaddle.
Ok, thnx for the timing. In any case most of the evidence was not presented. There will not be another riot so MAYBE more evidence can be presented.,
Doesn't have to be anther riot for a "disgruntled Trump supporter" to get off a lucky pot shot at Joe at the right time and place.
Link to Arizona presenting evidence???
Spot on, all planned, they have been a step ahead, because we were law abiders'.
I just watched this and was surprised at how mediocre her delivery was. She stumbled a lot, barely made eye contact and seemed to struggle to read her speaking notes. She had an iron-clad case but to me, lacked confidence in her delivery which hurt her.
The content is A-1 but it was definitely not a 'masterclass' in presentation.
Agreed. Needs to go to Toastmasters. Memorize the gist, go off an index card, make eye contact, look around the room, simplify the message down to a few points, crush it.
I thought Filbin stole the show. Completely dismantled the obstruction charge.
The way they stole the election was epic.
I have not witnessed a counter punch yet that would quantify as "epic".
Still looks like clown world to me. No one is stopping Biden and his faggotry. Everyone at the top that's "supposedly" on our side, appears to be a raging cuck, with the DNC's cum dribbling down their chin.
Repubs don't want the facts out. And since Trump not president, Harris may preside over hearing instead of Robert's. They can do what they want. They have 25,000 troops outside.
Hmmm... If anyone has the resources to do a planet-wide broadcast, Trump has them in spades.
SCANDAL FREE MY ASS
Is there going to be an uninterrupted international broadcast? He should have used the EAS to broadcast all of the evidence. But hey🤷♀️ shoulda, woulda, coulda.
Dimocrats control the trial. They will not allow the election to be discussed at all. That is what the trial is about. Saying anything other than the election was 100% legit is an insurrection.
That's what President Trump needs. Someone should tell him so he can keep spreading the word.
Pam is alright
But what court is this again? I didn't know they had a court date for the fraud sham we called an election of 2020
Unfortunately, MSM won't broadcast. All evidence will be buried by our tech overlords.
Don’t kid yourself that the major network will feel obligated to bring the entire proceedings to the public. If they’re afraid of facts actually getting out, they’ll just start showing edited summaries. This goes for the cable news channels as well. You’ll probably have to tune in to C-SPAN, or streaming coverage if you want to see the whole thing. And only a small percentage of people will do that. Normies will never see the facts...they’ll just hear that Trump was convicted
BERNIE CAN STILL WIN.
You go girl! Keep standing up for what you know is right and you can write your own ticket. We take care of our own...
This is true
... and her suit is absolutely classy.... she gonna let the light in, bless her n keep kickin ass sis!!! <3 MAGA2021
They wont get time to talk. The dems will just scream i rescind my time and interrupt then call it all off for inciting violence.
i must have sex with her