2009
Comments (46)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
farfiman 2 points ago +2 / -0

We didn't really since only politicians had a say.

10
NadlerShartWaddle 10 points ago +11 / -1

The "riot" started simultaneously with Arizona objections and evidence being presented. We had enough senators, house members, and evidence teed up that they were toast.

The so called invasion of the capital was a master stroke to end all of it.

And maybe I'm slightly stretching, but a few of their people running around finding and destroying evidence while there was a bit of panic and confusion, isn't outside the realm of possibility.

4
Untenablemorass 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nailed it. This was my take after watching everything unfold on here that day too. I thought it was REALLY fucking strange how everything went down immediately after the objections started and Trump wasn't even finished yet.

I also remember it was a little unsettling to me how the left was so quiet during the buildup to that day. Too silent, almost like they had something planned. This whole thing just plays way too perfectly into their hands.

I never considered the possibility of them using the distraction to destroy and cover up evidence, but knowing what we know now I'd say that most likely happened too.

2
Ldyluna 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed, NadlerShartWaddle.

1
farfiman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, thnx for the timing. In any case most of the evidence was not presented. There will not be another riot so MAYBE more evidence can be presented.,

0
NadlerShartWaddle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Doesn't have to be anther riot for a "disgruntled Trump supporter" to get off a lucky pot shot at Joe at the right time and place.

1
PatriotPirate 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link to Arizona presenting evidence???

1
mrredneck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spot on, all planned, they have been a step ahead, because we were law abiders'.