61
Comments (8)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
englishpleb [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Both state AND COUNTY level secessions. If only a few states leave, then you basically have a huge corrupt communist state as a neighbor looking for the first opportunity to bear down on you. Think about how the globalist cabal through use of China corrupted our systems, except now China's next door. There's just not enough to make it viable in the long term.

But if all red counties come along, they're the ones that are left without a viable foundation. Then it's negotiate or war, and the latter would be very detrimental for them given the percentage of Federal military power on red territories that will likely be co-opted by the seceding territories.

Enclves of blue counties/cities would be a problem traditionally from a defensive perspective, but the nature of our enemy is different- I doubt they would have enough willing soldiers. One of the GREATEST WEAKNESSES of a group solely out for themselves is that self-interest ends when one dies. So few if any with selfishness as a primary concern would want to die for the cause, which is what war requires. (See Machiavelli and mercenary armies. Also a reason why they want to accelerate ideological indoctrination, which is another reason why we can't wait another generation or two.) In addition, they also have the same problems for border control which we can use to our advantage. Once secession is accomplished, we can play a reverse UNO on their lax voting standards and have massive voting drives from our territories to theirs, changing them from within.

Leave them with minimal landmass, a throne without the kingdom, and reacquire them later when their policies run them into the ground. This will be one of the more peaceful ways of forcing a confrontation we can win.

Spread the word.