Absolutely. Lots of people only get their news from that clown. At least they are being exposed to opposing views for once. I’m surprised they allowed Rand Paul on
These are the SAME "people" who claimed in 2005, along with Al Gore, that "ALL teh CIENCE was iN!" and Florida would be under 6 feet of Water by 2015, if we didn't turn over the economy to the Dims and Al Gore. Florida, in 2021 IS NOT UNDER 6 FEET OF WATER DIPSHITS!" They were WRONG then and they are WRONG NOW.
But no, you don't see, it is because of Obama that Florida is not underwater. He used his magical voodoo power to rising sea levels. Floridians should be so thankful that they should build statues to the big O.
Look, we have no idea what happened behind the scenes, but there is a non-zero chance that in the underground tunnels on 1/6/21, he and other senators were threatened to an extreme degree to certify.
Remember Senator's Hawley's house was attacked in a drive-by by BLM.
I want to know the truth about all this, things just don't sit well and they can only sit less and less well.
"As you know, from when you were White House communications director for the Clinton Administration, there are procedures..." would have been a great way to begin a rebuttal.
"Why cant you just say the words" every time i hear a marxist liberal cuck say these words i dig my finger deep into my asshole and then smear a Hitler stash on their lip.
Where was that fight when it counted for anything. That is the problem with Rand Paul, he only takes the correct position when he is going to lose anyway. He doesn't change anything, he just tries to make himself look good.
I really think a lot of politicians need much better training in handling interviews.
The correct response to this should be is that a fact?
Always turn the question around. Most interviewers in the fake news are fake and don't ask real questions. They make statements instead.
You have to then turn around and ask the question what makes you think that's a fact? Are you saying you have proof?
The statement made with this pseudo question is this: "I have undeniable proof that the election was not stolen."
That's what Rand Paul should have heard and then he should have demanded the host present this to the people, congress, etc.
Rand Paul handles this poorly. Most people do. Don't go on the defence, go on the offence. Throw your enemy.
Say you don't need evidence. When they say what? They go crazy thinking you're mad.
Then point out you don't need evidence to look for evidence.
They won't immediately get it. Don't get roped into explaining the logical fallacy too much just drop some little bombs like this.
Let it stew in their minds.
Ask questions like did the DOJ look. Also point out he's being a spokes person for the DOJ and Barr. He should bring them onto the show and let them talk for themselves or shut up. He says it's been looked at. Ask him if he's look at it.
In an interview with a hostile actor you must always put your interviewer back on the stand. Interrogate them. Challenge his position don't just try to promote your own.
Also ask him if he thinks the 2016 election was stolen.
Also ask him to define fact.
The correct answer to was it stolen or not is I don't know and that's what we're trying to find out. Personally I project a very high probability it was but when you're investigating you don't gamble. You also point out that it's journalists like this that are trying to stop people from finding out. Then ask why that is.
Also you've got to ask him about these investigations. Exactly what did they investigate and how. Also you want to focus on how complete these investigations are (thorough). You can make a fairly simple point the more you investigate the more you find.
The purpose is to quickly run him down to questions that leave him confused, that he can't answer or leaves him to admit he doesn't know showing that in fact he doesn't know anything.
If Rand Paul studies this kind of technique he'll be much better on the stand next time.
Remember, this is a TV presenter. He doesn't need any real intelligence or skills. All he has to do is be well presented and most of the time read from a prompt. Do you notice how even most of his arguments are reading from a prompt in a manner of speaking saying this said this and this said that? All he sees around him are prompts.
Your job on TV is to reveal him. To show how arrogant he is, how unqualified he is, what an idiot he is. To expose the fake news reader and pseudo journalist on TV to everyone for the whole world to see. To embarrass him and make it clear just how unworthy he is.
Millions of people watched the steal happen live.
It's Rand's fault for deciding to go on USSA Clown World state media.
He held his own. If his going there even changed 1 persons mind or opened them up to look into it then it was worth it.
Yes, exposing redpills to normies should not be villified.
Absolutely. Lots of people only get their news from that clown. At least they are being exposed to opposing views for once. I’m surprised they allowed Rand Paul on
George wants to call an opinion a fact and the opinion isn't even based on fact. So much cringe. Nice try, small fry.
These are the SAME "people" who claimed in 2005, along with Al Gore, that "ALL teh CIENCE was iN!" and Florida would be under 6 feet of Water by 2015, if we didn't turn over the economy to the Dims and Al Gore. Florida, in 2021 IS NOT UNDER 6 FEET OF WATER DIPSHITS!" They were WRONG then and they are WRONG NOW.
But no, you don't see, it is because of Obama that Florida is not underwater. He used his magical voodoo power to rising sea levels. Floridians should be so thankful that they should build statues to the big O.
Look, we have no idea what happened behind the scenes, but there is a non-zero chance that in the underground tunnels on 1/6/21, he and other senators were threatened to an extreme degree to certify.
Remember Senator's Hawley's house was attacked in a drive-by by BLM.
I want to know the truth about all this, things just don't sit well and they can only sit less and less well.
Wasn't George one of the people who attended Epstein's celebratory party after his release from prison 10 or so years ago?
George is a dip shit liar. Fact. End of conversation‼️
i fucking hate georgey...hope he dies a horrible death that has nothing to do with me or us.
One is a current US senator. The other was Bill Clintons chief of staff
"As you know, from when you were White House communications director for the Clinton Administration, there are procedures..." would have been a great way to begin a rebuttal.
ABC does that all the time. That's why I stopped watching that midget years ago.
“Senator the threshold question is actually my propaganda...”
Uh Rand had the chance to vote to get to the bottom of it and balked. Not buying his shit now.
"Why cant you just say the words" every time i hear a marxist liberal cuck say these words i dig my finger deep into my asshole and then smear a Hitler stash on their lip.
Fuck him, it doesn't matter what he says anymore. He is senator to an illegitimate government, we need to secede.
Where was that fight when it counted for anything. That is the problem with Rand Paul, he only takes the correct position when he is going to lose anyway. He doesn't change anything, he just tries to make himself look good.
That was refreshing.
I really think a lot of politicians need much better training in handling interviews.
The correct response to this should be is that a fact?
Always turn the question around. Most interviewers in the fake news are fake and don't ask real questions. They make statements instead.
You have to then turn around and ask the question what makes you think that's a fact? Are you saying you have proof?
The statement made with this pseudo question is this: "I have undeniable proof that the election was not stolen."
That's what Rand Paul should have heard and then he should have demanded the host present this to the people, congress, etc.
Rand Paul handles this poorly. Most people do. Don't go on the defence, go on the offence. Throw your enemy.
Say you don't need evidence. When they say what? They go crazy thinking you're mad.
Then point out you don't need evidence to look for evidence.
They won't immediately get it. Don't get roped into explaining the logical fallacy too much just drop some little bombs like this.
Let it stew in their minds.
Ask questions like did the DOJ look. Also point out he's being a spokes person for the DOJ and Barr. He should bring them onto the show and let them talk for themselves or shut up. He says it's been looked at. Ask him if he's look at it.
In an interview with a hostile actor you must always put your interviewer back on the stand. Interrogate them. Challenge his position don't just try to promote your own.
Also ask him if he thinks the 2016 election was stolen.
Also ask him to define fact.
The correct answer to was it stolen or not is I don't know and that's what we're trying to find out. Personally I project a very high probability it was but when you're investigating you don't gamble. You also point out that it's journalists like this that are trying to stop people from finding out. Then ask why that is.
Also you've got to ask him about these investigations. Exactly what did they investigate and how. Also you want to focus on how complete these investigations are (thorough). You can make a fairly simple point the more you investigate the more you find.
The purpose is to quickly run him down to questions that leave him confused, that he can't answer or leaves him to admit he doesn't know showing that in fact he doesn't know anything.
If Rand Paul studies this kind of technique he'll be much better on the stand next time.
Remember, this is a TV presenter. He doesn't need any real intelligence or skills. All he has to do is be well presented and most of the time read from a prompt. Do you notice how even most of his arguments are reading from a prompt in a manner of speaking saying this said this and this said that? All he sees around him are prompts.
Your job on TV is to reveal him. To show how arrogant he is, how unqualified he is, what an idiot he is. To expose the fake news reader and pseudo journalist on TV to everyone for the whole world to see. To embarrass him and make it clear just how unworthy he is.
Incorrect, that wasnt an opinion.
"'This election was not stolen.' Do you accept that fact?"
That was a lie.
That smug look on his face. I’d love to feed it a couple elbows.
Probably one of the only Republicans with a real spine. God Bless Rand Paul.
Nice job Senator Paul.
“Threshold” = you’re an Untermensch if you disagree with such an oBVioUs fAcT
FUCK YOU RAND
The media is so fucking evil
How very Commie of him to ask that question.
George Stephanopolus is a contemptible creature.