995
posted ago by DeepMind ago by DeepMind +995 / -0

I know the article is old.

Anyone served/serving who can comment on this?

https://web.archive.org/web/20201112004544/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5392363/Army-wont-require-recruits-throw-grenade-far-enough.html

  • US Army will no longer require recruits to show adequate hand grenade skills
  • Change is being made because many enlistees 'can’t throw it far enough'
  • Recruits also won't be required to pass land navigation course to graduate
  • Army's redesign of Basic Combat Training is aimed at instilling more discipline
  • Many on Twitter used the development to attack influx of female enlistees
  • But the US Army denied that the change had anything to do with gender
Comments (95)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
RedditIsCommunist 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hadn’t thought of that, but I know there are some non-obvious differences between men and women. Like for example, according to research I’ve read women effectively have a wider field of view and men have a narrower one and it has something to do with how dispersed the fovea is. That means women should be better at spotting threats earlier than men, but men would be better at something else like maybe aiming at details. There are also differences in visual processing like this https://www.livescience.com/22894-men-and-women-see-things-differently.html

Maybe the underhand pitching in women’s softball has something to do with the shoulder thing you’re talking about.

1
DeepMind [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting. Definitely written before full blown marxists takeover.

1
Trilby 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting! That's a good reason why a man and a woman can make a good team. But throwing a grenade together would be tricky.