35
Comments (15)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
PerDiem 8 points ago +10 / -2

Once again: no context for who this is or why he knows this info. This could be anybody once you blur the face out. Please stick to things we have concrete facts to support. Lin Wood has gone astray with this stuff and it isn't helpful.

5
Food4thought 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lynn Wood is very much a part of the distraction that was Q. I have no animosity towards the Q folks for being gullible, but we need to be aware that this move by Lynn damaged our credibility for supporting him. It was always about election fraud and LW helped derail that.

2
DefundMedia45 2 points ago +2 / -0

My thoughts too. Only way this would be considered any kind of evidence is if he was not anonymous. But they didn’t do a good job at it since his voice was left unaltered. Anyone that he worked with would be able to easily identify by voice

0
bigchubby 0 points ago +2 / -2

Stop whining.

2
PerDiem 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whining? I didn't realize being rational and focused on reality translates to "whining".

1
bigchubby 1 point ago +1 / -0

So should we just ignore that Justice Roberts is a criminal or just put that aside for you ?

1
PerDiem 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should obtain proof that he is a criminal lest we continue to make fools of ourselves with Qanonsense.