6547
Comments (317)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
189
Deemike [S] 189 points ago +192 / -3

Yup.

And Trump’s moderate approach to policy implementation. Check out this article I just read:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/ice-email-deportations-biden-order-tucker-carlson

No lube, just ramming it down.

148
Keiichi81 148 points ago +150 / -2

After regaining power, Democrats are busy making sure they can never lose it again.

117
BukakeJake 117 points ago +119 / -2

They won't lose again. Ever. They will flood the country with illegals, settle them in borderline red / blue districts, and give them citizenship. And if they will lose, it will be a Bush or McCain type of republican that has the support of the globalists. Trump fought tooth and nail for the people of this country.

59
buco 59 points ago +60 / -1

20 million Illegals already here, POTATUS will give them amnesty before Nancy removes him with the 25th. Another caravan with 6000 on the way, the first of many.

35
ParktonKing 35 points ago +35 / -0

They are pushing this through because the blow back will be against Biden, and Kamala will come in with a clean slate

19
BSnatch 19 points ago +20 / -1

That 25th amendment hearing they had months ago makes so much sense now. They knew they would win, because fraud, so they might as well go ahead and start working on their plan to get him out

5
deleted 5 points ago +14 / -9
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
DarkRiver 13 points ago +13 / -0

True. Their HR1 bill is clear they want to hold on to power for a long time. Congratulations GOP and 30 Pence

9
Newacct 9 points ago +9 / -0

Any amnesty will result in a massive influx of illegal aliens, much larger than 6,000. I'd guess 6,000,000 in the first year alone.

7
Itateeverybody 7 points ago +7 / -0

I doubt they even need the illegals. They just stole an election from the most popular candidate in history using a few targeted fraudulent county totals.

4
TheNotSoEvilEngineer 4 points ago +6 / -2

He tweeted tooth and nail and made some general policies. He needed to go further. He had an army ready to fix this, and he never used it. Little blood then would have saved a lot of blood later.

6
RoBatten 6 points ago +6 / -0

Judging by the army's response from its leaders, and grunts, Trump never really had the military behind him. The DIA has been exposed for buying cell data logs available commercially to avoid those pesky warrants in order to spy on all of us. So, yeah, the military was never really behind him, and that's why he left the way he did. HE HAD NO SUPPORT whatsoever.

29
SellTheSun 29 points ago +29 / -0

Yup, this is the exact same shit they did in Cali. They got into power once and a once solid red state became a reliable democrat state EVERY SINGLE ELECTION AFTER THAT.

California residents tried to save their state with prop 187 and passed a referendum to curb the illegals being brought into the state by the dems. After it passed, the dems sued the next day in court and of course a federal judge found it unconstitutional and nullified the people's vote. Immediately after that, the dem governor halted all appeals to that federal judges ruling and no more cases were allowed to be heard on the issue.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_California_Proposition_187

12
Notablitheringidiot 12 points ago +14 / -2

In November 1997, Pfaelzer found the law to be unconstitutional

Born to a Jewish family in Los Angeles , California in 1926,[1] Pfaelzer

Add another coincidence to the pile.

6
SellTheSun 6 points ago +6 / -0

110 yesterday

9
D0NNIE_DARK0 9 points ago +9 / -0

Terrible. Thanks for the historical background.

2
AppalachianTactical 2 points ago +2 / -0

*establishment

2
Ruzzty 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can lose power. Just not how they want/wish.

17
TwistedSister 17 points ago +19 / -2

He's just clearing his throat. This ain't nothing.

6
DRKMSTR 6 points ago +6 / -0

Please post archive links next time.

Blaze is cancer to any mobile web browser.

-5
Frogleg3 -5 points ago +9 / -14

Trump was always controlled opposition.

That much should be obvious to anyone who looks objectively now. We all loved us some Trump talk and visuals but now we know.

He kept Barr and Wray long after they were obviously not arresting the swamp crooks. Therefore trump didn't actually want the swamp crooks arrested. Period. No excuses.

This is the reality.

4
Platinum 4 points ago +5 / -1

I didn't want to think this too, but he kinda was. He did nothing but WAIT all December when he should have been strong-arming Audits with the Military. I like Trump but he let this happen. He wasn't aggressive enough in the end.

6
Frogleg3 6 points ago +7 / -1

I don't like the obvious conclusion either.

I hate it.

Yet facts don't lie.

3
Jadeity2 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is stupid. Why would Trump put his family, fortune and reputation at risk to be controlled opposition when there are no shortage of potential controlled opposition candidates? It is only thanks to Trump that we know the depth of the swamp, why would they install controlled opposition that exposes them?

1
Frogleg3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of us knew the depth of the swamp before trump ran.

Hell even Michael Moore in his movie fareinheit 911 20 years ago documented the Saudis paying off all the congressmen and George w bush being bailed out by bin Laden's brother.

Alex Jones had been documenting it for decades.

If trump wasn't swamp then his one mistake was thinking Alex Jones was a wacko conspiracy theorist and couldn't possibly be correct.

I guess trump knows better now.