6547
Comments (317)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
-17
YourOwnGreatGrandma -17 points ago +1 / -18

That’s because Democrats alleged fraud that was big enough to overturn the election. It was all nonsense, but they at least made the allegation.

Trump would talk about fraud that was big enough to overturn the election, but when his lawyers filed in court they wouldn’t allege that kind of evidence. We were stuck in a situation where the fraud was obvious but we didn’t have the right kind of evidence to prove it.

4
day221 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you dumb? The Georgia video alone has enough ballots being counted without observers and under suspicipus circumstances to change the election outcome multiple times over as just one example. Did we ever find out who those votes on those machines went for during that time period? There is an electronic log, the court could have ordered that information be made available. But they didn't.

The error bars this election were an order of magnitude greater than the margin of victory in most of the swing states. Give me a break.

6
BukakeJake 6 points ago +6 / -0

If the Democrats had this amount of proof four years ago, Hillary would be in office plain and simple.

1
mk81 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with this. Every "journalist" would be an amateur data scientist by this point and Democrats would have fought like rabid dogs.