You'll see all the reasons cases weren't seen under the "disposition" category. There's also a column called "decided on merit" and every case says NO.
You're right - I scanned the site briefly before commenting and should have looked at it more thoroughly before saying that. My apologies!
Yes, basically to your second question. "The campaign failed to show that it had suffered an 'injury in fact' caused by the defendants that would be addressed by the remedy it sought."
This is the site the article links to:
http://wiseenergy.org/Energy/Election/2020_Election_Cases.htm
You'll see all the reasons cases weren't seen under the "disposition" category. There's also a column called "decided on merit" and every case says NO.
Are we looking at the same link? It says that 12 cases were decided on merit...
Thank you. From looking briefly, though, a lot of the cases have 'Yes' on Decided on Merit. Are these different types of cases?
Just for my own clarification, lack of standing means that the court decided that the plaintiff did not have the right to file the case?
You're right - I scanned the site briefly before commenting and should have looked at it more thoroughly before saying that. My apologies!
Yes, basically to your second question. "The campaign failed to show that it had suffered an 'injury in fact' caused by the defendants that would be addressed by the remedy it sought."