posted ago by Mitzhatzmakoph ago by Mitzhatzmakoph +7 / -0

You aren't intelligent nor are you anything sort of logical or reasonable. You are adopting postmodernism philosphies and justifying "individual" truth. This mentality and philosophy is how we got gender studies, gender spectrum, wokeism etc.

Truth doesn't function on an individual level and it is not decided in that manner either. Truth has been and always will be Trurh. Facts are circumstantial and temporal. Facts can change. "this is a table" is fact while a table, however, when the table is burned it is no longer a table, it becomes ash. Therefore, after the table been burned to ash the fact is: "this is a table" is no longer valid. Same goes for before the table was made from wood. It wasn't a table it was a tree......The fact "this is a table" is not Truth because it changes. Facts can change, truth cannot. Truth has been and will always be Truth and doesn't change.

Additionally...You cannot have two truths ir facts that are contradictory of each other. Impossible. The oxymoron or the paradox are not possible with relation to Truth and facts that exists when attributed to a specific thing. "the table is here, but it isn't here" is impossible. A thing can't be simultaneously present but not.

So, stop posting bullshit that has no source as well as verification of fact. You can't post a quote that is false and say "it is up to you to determine true or flase" when someone asks "what's the source?" - OPs who do this are just as lazy as the MSM. Also, this logic is putrid and ridiculous. You may believe a lie to be factual but that it doesn't make it a fact it will always be a lie.

All of you that believe this post-modernism philosophy is okay because it is your "1A right to believe and say anything". Well, you aren't incorrect in the fact that you can believe and say anything you want. But, that doesn't mean what you say or believe is correct, useful or accurate. Use your 1A for something of value. Share facts and help lay out the path to Truth.

Clean your shit up, Patriots! Stop acting like postmodernists!

Comments (13)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
MaxItout 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not not in full opposition to you. Truth is truth. A Fact can change depending on circumstance or newly acquired knowledge. As in your example a Table is only a table after it is made and before it is burnt. But there is Perception. You may not like it but that is individual based. One Mans trash is another mans treasure. Dirty old Soda cans are NOT valuable to you, but to the guy that recycles Aluminum it is. A Table is a table, it is broadly defined as such. but it can vary in size and shape based off of personal taste and cultural norms. Some people really want to be owned by the state. They truly believe their life will be better if planned centrally. You can disagree with them. you can Argue. but if that is what they "want" what are you going to do about it? if you jump off a tall building a Truth and several Facts come into play about gravity and physics. But to decide to jump or not. That is an individuals Perception about their truth.

1
Mitzhatzmakoph [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Perception doesn't change facts or Truth. All I am trying to do is get people to stop parroting obvious bullshit and then getting their panties in a wod when they are called out or challenged. The common replies: shill, (((they))), pedo, Commie, Qtard, etc. are all exactly the same thing the left does when you challenge or call them out, examples: racist, xenophobe, sexist, homophobe, etc.

Does this method of discourse lead to anything other than fracturing into small enclaves of people who are triggered when a debate is called?

1
MaxItout 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Perception doesn't change facts or Truth" correct, But perception changes the value. you basically said it when you said "getting their panties in a wod". They have a perception. They Mold their values around their perception.

"Does this method of discourse lead to anything other than fracturing into small enclaves of people who are triggered when a debate is called?" This is a "Black pill" moment. I hate to say it we need to unify but we have a million Voices pulling everyone in different directions. And if we pick a leader to help focus argument or movement the "establishment" will have someone to laser focus on to destroy.

Whitepill: Something is happening at the base level. it has been growing for a long time. it became more visible during the TEA party days. There is a core amount of people that believe in civil liberties, low taxes, less regulations and smaller government. But the TEA Party was taken out cause the Left targeted it with lies and the GOP "establishment" who saw a risk to their insider money making schemes so they did not defend it. The movement rose again under Trump. The "establishment" delude themselves that we are a Cult of Just "Trump supporters" Trump did not make this WAVE, he road it.

1
Mitzhatzmakoph [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude, some excellent points. Perspectives...yes, changes the value in a person's heart/mind. Again, though, doesn't change it in reality.

This is why we need a new party or parties. Pull thr DNC and RNC numbers and funds. Just kick them in the balls over and over and over.

The TEA party was totally taken iver and destroyed by idiots like Palin and others n And you answered my question about the base. RAD!!!

You are the friend I have been hunting for. So let me ask you this: third parties-- viable or pipedream?

1
MaxItout 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am not sure. sadly. it is needed. The Power hungry have the leavers of Government. They will not want to let go. it is bigger than one person, it will take all of us. I keep hoping the Dems Massively over reach. right now they have us at a slow boil. people keep just accepting the next little thing. I hope they put the Gas to high over stepping and getting the "Normies" mad.