6392
Comments (639)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
261
NPC11011110000 261 points ago +264 / -3

Stephanopolous is a leftwing piece of shit. He's the enemy of the people spouting the same bullshit lies.

Yes the election was stolen.

88
Anaconda 88 points ago +107 / -19

Fuck Rand Paul. He voted for Biden on 1/6.

Rand Paul is a bigger piece of shit than Georgie. Rand has power. Georgie is just a retard on TV

39
FLYWHEEL_PRIME 39 points ago +45 / -6

I get that you're upset, but holy shit what a stupid thing to say on this website of all places.

Georgie is just a retard on TV

Implying that Georgie didn't have any REAL power???? Bruh the last 4 years have shown that the modern media has literally ALL the power to influence anything they want. They have a modern day Infinity Gauntlet which can render reality null and fantasy real. The MSM controls all narratives, even the false ones.

7
infeststation 7 points ago +10 / -3

They didn't have control in 2016 and they didn't in 2020. If the election wasn't rigged, you wouldn't be saying they have power. They set up and they cover up but the globalist/ democrat/ establishment are the ones that have the (stolen) power.

33
NPC11011110000 33 points ago +33 / -0

The media are the architects of 2020. They set up the steal with lies as these:

  • Trump will contest the election: They wanted to normalize Trump contesting the election so people would think that Trump is just being a typical crybaby when he loses. They were setting this up so no one would see a contested election as something shocking and out of the ordinary from Trump.

  • Biden would get the majority of mail-in votes: Based on what data? This was so that no one would question the disproportionate amount of Biden votes in the late night ballot dumps.

  • The "Red Mirage" narrative: The media knew that Trump would win on election night, but they needed to give the public a reason why they wouldn't call the race with Trump up by millions of votes.

  • Calling some states too early and waiting too long to call others: This leads me to believe they were participants in the steal.

  • Prematurely calling the race for Biden and immediately attacking Trump when he challenged the results.

They have too much power and abuse it. They are the enemy of the people and participated in the steal. I'd throw them all in prison.

5
mrsucko 5 points ago +5 / -0

The media 100% had TONS of power in 2020. They assumed they had power in 2016. The Democrats didn't fraud hard enough. 2020 they knew they needed more than just the media to pump fake polls and dissuade conservatives from voting.

If you think the media doesn't have any sort of power, you need to get your head checked.

4
D0NNIE_DARK0 4 points ago +4 / -0

People are forgetting that Hillary, per the email hacks, directed the MSM to cover Trump nonstop. She thought he was a buffoon she could easily beat. The more people saw of him then the more turned off they’d be. Remember Jeb saying Trump got 3 billion in free advertising? That’s not far off. Trump is a showman and the ratings were high. The press wasn’t going to make that mistake again.

2
LongDongDonald420x69 2 points ago +3 / -1

this

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
3
FLYWHEEL_PRIME 3 points ago +3 / -0

You seem reasonable and well adjusted

1
mean_mission 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, George is definitely a bigger piece of shit. Even given what you just said, watching the interview and that smug look on Georgie's face....

50
Silencemennow 50 points ago +50 / -0

"No widespread evidence of election fraud".....

Their old talking point that was designed to shut off the npc cpu.

30
Oback_Barama 30 points ago +30 / -0

Then how much was there George? Since “it’s been decided”, exactly how much was there and exactly how much more would it have taken to meet your definition of “widespread”? How much fraud is ok with the Media? Is that number the same if the other candidate “wins”?

Fuck off George.

5
cryogen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not to mention it's targeted or strategic fraud that we're talking about here. It doesn't need to be widespread to be deciding.

11
BecMonTchew 11 points ago +11 / -0

So, he’s good with some dog shit in his sandwich, as long as it’s not widespread. Personally, I prefer no dog shit in my sandwich at all, but maybe that’s just me.

22
PraiseBeToScience 22 points ago +22 / -0

I great question for him would be "You admit that no election is perfect, so you agree some level of fraud occurred. Precisely how many fraudulent ballots were cast? If you actually did investigate allegations of fraud, you surely must have that number on hand, right? But you don't have a number. You don't know. You just say that everything is a lie and no investigation produced evidence. If there was an investigation, you'd be able to tell us how many fraudulent ballots were cast - even if they weren't enough to change the election. But you don't have that number. Because there was no investigation. You're a craven, partisan hack. Die in a fire you communist."

2
HappyPedeInCA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great point!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
TenScoops 3 points ago +3 / -0

and he will continue to do so, because we let them