Comment section is filth. Switching alliances every other day based on political aspirations and not principle. Look at all you that humped all over "cocaine mitch", "lindsey 2.0", and "lion Ted" and calling everyone based as long as they pay you lip service (based Nancy Mace). The FACT is Rand is a good guy and he does what is right, he can't be made responsible for Trump putting in people who are disloyal into the administration. Frankly, if Trump advised with Rand on who to put into the administration, he'd have a lot more loyalists willing to fight the deep state to do the right thing.
You are right on all counts. I have disagreed with Paul more times than I can count but no one can disagree with the fact that Paul's arguments are always based in fact and law , not in emotion, and are often practical and sound solutions even if we don't want to hear or deal with them at the time.
Comment section is filth. Switching alliances every other day based on political aspirations and not principle. Look at all you that humped all over "cocaine mitch", "lindsey 2.0", and "lion Ted" and calling everyone based as long as they pay you lip service (based Nancy Mace). The FACT is Rand is a good guy and he does what is right, he can't be made responsible for Trump putting in people who are disloyal into the administration. Frankly, if Trump advised with Rand on who to put into the administration, he'd have a lot more loyalists willing to fight the deep state to do the right thing.
You are right on all counts. I have disagreed with Paul more times than I can count but no one can disagree with the fact that Paul's arguments are always based in fact and law , not in emotion, and are often practical and sound solutions even if we don't want to hear or deal with them at the time.