Whenever you hear this NPC talking point calmly thank them and ask what “fraud” they would like to acknowledge.
Because “no fraud” and “not enough to overturn the election” are two entirely different things. Play their own word games against them and force them to admit what we all know.
How can they know that there wasn’t enough fraud to overturn the results of the election unless they have conducted a full signature audit in every disputed county? (They can't)
In December I told a big lib guy I don’t even give a shit about the fraud because the PA allowing the universal voting with the legislature was enough to throw out 600K votes and his jaw dropped and he told me I’m right and I said that it doesn’t matter because no court will throw out an election
"we didn't NEED to cheat"
but you did. i don't care if lance would have won without doping. he still is disqualified
The only people that cannot see the fraud are babies still in there mother's womb. Everyone in the world could see the fraud some just won't admit it.
So a few lawsuits (?) were tossed because they were for small amounts of ballots.
So you have to explain to them that each lawsuit is each type of fraud.
Democrats created the voter fraud network. One Democrat operative might have been only able to flip 500 votes, but working together thousands.
They were able to execute 1000 different types of voter fraud which all added up. Voting machines, double counted ballots, dead people, people who moved, fake ballots, etc.
Explain that American politics is very 50/50 and states were won with just 20,000 votes or less!