It's called pacing and leading. This is the pacing part. He is repeating the things that the people are thinking and saying to gain a following. He plans to lead everyone off of a cliff later.
He actually builds the case for why populism exists. Well done. Even a hippie faggot can be right on occasion. Here is to hoping that he strings together a few more coherent and reasonable thoughts and completes the transformation.
Great Reset, not too much different in its aims from those of Pol Pot and his Year Zero lunacy.
As for Klaus Schwab, the supposed originator of the idea, I'm at a loss to see how the guy got to be so influential. He seems only to have been an academic professing to be an expert in economics, and in common with 99% of economists he has never produced anything and has been good at hind casting.
At age 82 it seems likely he'll be off to meet Jesus before too much longer has passed, but dont worry, the world has an infinite capacity to produce bogus visionaries, luckily for us they only rarely connect with the levers in the control room.
Russel Brand is remarkably reasonable. Sure, he is about as left wing as Chomsky is, but he is fairly down to earth and sharp, most likely due to how hard he has been broken down and dragged through the mud.
Even his take on the Capitol Storming was probably the most reasonable take I've seen so far. He also understands that populism isn't an evil and that its only portrayed as such because the elite controls the media; populism is and will always be a symptom of a failing democracy; it is what inevitably follows when the establishment neglects issues for decades or think they can push through abhorrent and utterly unacceptable to the point of treasonous policy by simply frog-boiling the populace.
The reason why populism has gotten such a bad rep is because its the precipice; once populism is rejected, civil war is all that remains. Once populism can't get through the ballot box, it simply means that democracy has failed; either the system is too rigged or its leader too lax and an overhaul is all that awaits it.
Democracy is not, was not and will never be some kind of golden method to assure good judgement of governance. What it is however is the only viable method to delegitimize all political violence within it. Once democracy ceases to works, violence becomes legitimate again. Its the simple practical of it all
It's called pacing and leading. This is the pacing part. He is repeating the things that the people are thinking and saying to gain a following. He plans to lead everyone off of a cliff later.
He actually builds the case for why populism exists. Well done. Even a hippie faggot can be right on occasion. Here is to hoping that he strings together a few more coherent and reasonable thoughts and completes the transformation.
Russell Brand is an unmitigated faggot, and should be hated.
Great Reset, not too much different in its aims from those of Pol Pot and his Year Zero lunacy.
As for Klaus Schwab, the supposed originator of the idea, I'm at a loss to see how the guy got to be so influential. He seems only to have been an academic professing to be an expert in economics, and in common with 99% of economists he has never produced anything and has been good at hind casting.
At age 82 it seems likely he'll be off to meet Jesus before too much longer has passed, but dont worry, the world has an infinite capacity to produce bogus visionaries, luckily for us they only rarely connect with the levers in the control room.
He was married to Katy Perry so he's done some cabal shit.
He's a die-hard lefty nonce, don't be fooled.
Russel Brand is remarkably reasonable. Sure, he is about as left wing as Chomsky is, but he is fairly down to earth and sharp, most likely due to how hard he has been broken down and dragged through the mud.
Even his take on the Capitol Storming was probably the most reasonable take I've seen so far. He also understands that populism isn't an evil and that its only portrayed as such because the elite controls the media; populism is and will always be a symptom of a failing democracy; it is what inevitably follows when the establishment neglects issues for decades or think they can push through abhorrent and utterly unacceptable to the point of treasonous policy by simply frog-boiling the populace.
The reason why populism has gotten such a bad rep is because its the precipice; once populism is rejected, civil war is all that remains. Once populism can't get through the ballot box, it simply means that democracy has failed; either the system is too rigged or its leader too lax and an overhaul is all that awaits it.
Democracy is not, was not and will never be some kind of golden method to assure good judgement of governance. What it is however is the only viable method to delegitimize all political violence within it. Once democracy ceases to works, violence becomes legitimate again. Its the simple practical of it all