1540
Comments (52)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
8
WU_HAN_FRU 8 points ago +8 / -0

You obviously didn’t listen to the recording.

0
lst1194 0 points ago +1 / -1

i listened to the whole thing.

4
WU_HAN_FRU 4 points ago +4 / -0

So you're fully aware that it is not as you describe.

0
lst1194 0 points ago +1 / -1

My fren you haven't listened to it. It's clear he references SCOTUS Roberts and his adoption of two children with Epstein's help. LISTEN TO WHAT HE SAYS AT 33:25 and so on. If you cannot honestly agree with my statement then you're in denial.

3
WU_HAN_FRU 3 points ago +3 / -0

What the fuck are you talking about?

Go ahead and point out where I said he DIDN'T reference Roberts and Epstein.

It's obvious that he is objecting to the law school dean lying about him, not that he's butthurt about them changing the name of the courtroom, as you falsely claim. It's clear from the recording he couldn't care less about that.

-3
TruthyBrat -3 points ago +1 / -4

I did, and tend to agree with our fren u/lst1194.

What do you object to in his characterization of the situation there?

8
WU_HAN_FRU 8 points ago +8 / -0

As you and your fren are both fully aware, Mercer is already starting the process of taking Wood's name off the courtroom they already named for him. Your fren is trying to make it sound like they already changed the name and Wood is in there making a bunch of demands about it. This is false. The whole thing is a Zoom meeting that the law school dean opens by slandering and lying about him. He catches her lying and proves she was lying, and there's not a thing she can say, because she knows she got caught. A couple of times Wood promises to send them proof of his claims. Sure enough, video turned up this weekend of a man claiming exactly what Lin Wood has been saying. And I imagine more will follow. It is frankly not possible that you and your friend were unaware of that video evidence, which is all over this site, and it's not possible that he mischaracterizes what is said in that meeting accidentally.

1
Kekislaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

anyone have a link? I would love to see it. I'm still undecided about Lin.

0
lst1194 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sorry im not saying that they already changed the name! My point as plainly as i can state it is this. WORLD SHAKING PEDOPHILIA CLAIMS ABOUT A SCOTUS JUDGE AND ELITES BUT WILL NOT REVEAL IT TO THE PUBLIC. BUT WHEN A UNIVERSITY CONSIDERS REMOVING HIS NAME FROM A COURTROOM HE'S WILLING TO SHOW PROOF TO THEM.

2
WU_HAN_FRU 2 points ago +2 / -0

He released at least some of what he has this weekend. It's all over TDW.

Fucking shill. There's really something wrong with you people.

-1
TruthyBrat -1 points ago +2 / -3

Sure enough, video turned up this weekend of a man claiming exactly what Lin Wood has been saying.

I have not seen this video, or the video/recording Lin referred to the in the Mercer Zoom. And this is the issue I have with Lin, he needs to lay out the evidence he has and not wait for a courtroom to present it in.

3
WU_HAN_FRU 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm sure the video referred to and the video which is literally all over this forum are the same video.

Your "issue with Lin" is entirely disingenuous.