Yup. Plenty of "trans rights" folks start becoming sympathetic to "TERFs" once they actually research what the other side is advocating.
Preaching to the choir here, but it is interesting how any and all websites that promote "socially liberal" / nanny state ideology are also HEAVILY censored and moderated (see Reddit, for example). It's simply because such ideas are not organic or self-evident; instead they need to be forced upon people, repeatedly, by authoritarians.
It's true. Gay rights will always stick out to me as being rammed down people's throats until people became afraid of saying anything negative about homos.
The absolute best argument that the left has lost in the last decade is the same one that I don't see most conservatives hammering home.
In the 90s one of the go-to arguments for everything was "slippery slope fallacy". Didn't matter what you brought up logically e.g.
if you allow this now, then logically this will be next
They just screamed SLIPPERY SLOPE FALLACY YOU BIGOT. Of course....... literally all of that has been proven true. Every single warning in the 80s and 90s that was thrown aside has now been shown accurate. That's what needs to be driven home.
What's even scarier is if they "win" on the Trans thing and move onto their next progressive topic I don't see it being anything other than beastiality or pedophilia ( I know there are degenerates pushing these right this moment but I am talking full blown mass media wide spread support as Gays and Trans received). We are arriving at the point of cultural and moral death if we don't not only stop the advancement but also make gains in the opposite direction.
I don't see it being anything other than beastiality or pedophilia
Another contender is the vilification of normal relationships. Not just expanding the acceptable, but excluding the traditional. That's already an ongoing side project, but they might push it front and center next before moving on to adding new forms of degeneracy.
80s and 90s? try 50s and 60s... Loving v VA went to the Supreme Court was interracial marriage and before that there were cases on interreligion.
don't get me wrong, i don't give a fuck if people from different races or religions want to get married. but i don't think if someone wants to be with someone of their own race/religion, that there's anything wrong with that. even crazier, dating app data shows people overwhelmingly favor dating their own race.
but most of all, now these screechers are claiming that if you reject a gay MTF, it's a hate crime, or even wilder, that pedophilia is either a sexual orientation or just "trans-age".
Thing is, we could have done it the right way. Enough people were coming around on it that we could have arrived at a reasonable compromise through the legislature. But no. Leftists are tyrants and have to destroy everything they touch. Really sad to watch them inflict their sadistic mental illness on our beautiful country.
I mean, that’s not fair. Straight people have all sorts of insults for gays. It’s not like gay people have any insults for straight, cisgendered, bigotted, racist, white supremacists or have any institutional power to get you deplatformed or demoted if you make gay jokes, like they did with Eddie Murphy. Oh wait.....
TERFS, the only one of these activist groups that actually gives a shit about women. They are the only actual feminists. The rest are larpers who are Woke Intersectionalists exclusively while trying to keep the feminist word for Woke kudo points.
Yup. Plenty of "trans rights" folks start becoming sympathetic to "TERFs" once they actually research what the other side is advocating.
Preaching to the choir here, but it is interesting how any and all websites that promote "socially liberal" / nanny state ideology are also HEAVILY censored and moderated (see Reddit, for example). It's simply because such ideas are not organic or self-evident; instead they need to be forced upon people, repeatedly, by authoritarians.
It's true. Gay rights will always stick out to me as being rammed down people's throats until people became afraid of saying anything negative about homos.
The absolute best argument that the left has lost in the last decade is the same one that I don't see most conservatives hammering home.
In the 90s one of the go-to arguments for everything was "slippery slope fallacy". Didn't matter what you brought up logically e.g.
They just screamed SLIPPERY SLOPE FALLACY YOU BIGOT. Of course....... literally all of that has been proven true. Every single warning in the 80s and 90s that was thrown aside has now been shown accurate. That's what needs to be driven home.
Narrow is the path to righteousness and wide the path to hell.
The Bible actually warned that EVERYTHING is the slipper slope.
And the answer to restoration is so simple. repent of wickedness and trust in Jesus. Go and sin no more.
I think the best argument is "tolerance".
Ask progressives if they are tolerant. "Of course" They would say.
Follow that up with: We asked Christians to be tolerant about homosexuality. Which ideas that you disagree with are you tolerant about?
Honest ones will say no and cite Popper's paradox.
What's even scarier is if they "win" on the Trans thing and move onto their next progressive topic I don't see it being anything other than beastiality or pedophilia ( I know there are degenerates pushing these right this moment but I am talking full blown mass media wide spread support as Gays and Trans received). We are arriving at the point of cultural and moral death if we don't not only stop the advancement but also make gains in the opposite direction.
Hey, there's also incest they can promote next, though I bet it'll be a combination of incest and pedophilia.
Win lol everything they are doing is being blocked 😂
Another contender is the vilification of normal relationships. Not just expanding the acceptable, but excluding the traditional. That's already an ongoing side project, but they might push it front and center next before moving on to adding new forms of degeneracy.
80s and 90s? try 50s and 60s... Loving v VA went to the Supreme Court was interracial marriage and before that there were cases on interreligion.
don't get me wrong, i don't give a fuck if people from different races or religions want to get married. but i don't think if someone wants to be with someone of their own race/religion, that there's anything wrong with that. even crazier, dating app data shows people overwhelmingly favor dating their own race.
but most of all, now these screechers are claiming that if you reject a gay MTF, it's a hate crime, or even wilder, that pedophilia is either a sexual orientation or just "trans-age".
Thing is, we could have done it the right way. Enough people were coming around on it that we could have arrived at a reasonable compromise through the legislature. But no. Leftists are tyrants and have to destroy everything they touch. Really sad to watch them inflict their sadistic mental illness on our beautiful country.
Dude.... calling homos "homos" can be considered offensive. Try using "gay bastards."
Can we go straight to labelling them seditionists hellbent on destroying the US?
Works for me.
Gay rights.... Rammed down people's throats?
That sounds very gay.
I mean, that’s not fair. Straight people have all sorts of insults for gays. It’s not like gay people have any insults for straight, cisgendered, bigotted, racist, white supremacists or have any institutional power to get you deplatformed or demoted if you make gay jokes, like they did with Eddie Murphy. Oh wait.....
Yeah but TERFs are still man hating cunts, just useful ones cause they hate the trannys as well
TERFS, the only one of these activist groups that actually gives a shit about women. They are the only actual feminists. The rest are larpers who are Woke Intersectionalists exclusively while trying to keep the feminist word for Woke kudo points.
Feminism is retarded. Start to finish has only done damage
I don't know if that's good. TERFs are awful, awful people.