When Dominion Voting Systems falls for the bait and tries to sue Rudy Giuliani
(i.postimg.cc)
🇺🇸🎖️ MEME ARMY 🎖️🇺🇸
Comments (68)
sorted by:
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES
•
All
General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
Of course they have. Everyone here thinking this is some sort of slam-dunk to take down Dominion are the same people who would buy oceanfront property in Colorado.
Dominion is a multi-million dollar company. They're not going to dive headfirst into a defamation suit if they think it's going to hurt their bottom line.
The truth of the matter is that Dominion has a good case. Guilliani (and Powell, who was sued separately) made very serious claims. They did not have the evidence showing ballots actually being changed (and no folks, some guy doing a statistical analysis on Twitter is not the same as actual evidence of their claims). Even in discovery, this is dangerous.
What if Guilliani took his "evidence" and ask other experts to corroborate it, and they came back and said it's bullshit? That's something that absolutely could come out in discovery, and would then put a red mark right on him for pushing a dubious if not outright false claim.
I am not usually a betting man but I will say this - IF this gets close to trial, Guilliani and Powell will settle. The reason is very simple - IF they had the evidence showing this fraud (as they claimed...), where is it? Why wasn't it shown in court? The one case where they used the Dominion system as a point in the lawsuit, the court asked them to show them the evidence of votes being changed and they couldn't show it.
Counter argument to this would be: Why did Giuliani and Powell risk a lawsuit with Dominion KNOWING that a defamation case would eventually come to fruition?
Three of the most brilliant lawyers (the above + Wood) put their lives/careers on the line to fight for the truth. They had to expect this is all I'm saying...
I think knowing that SCOTUS was compromised and Alito/Thomas were the only Judges willing to look at the evidence was disheartening to Trump.
You can't do much when SCOTUS won't view the evidence.
Simple answer? Grift.
Powell raked in hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations for the "legal fund."
Guilliani reportedly wanted to charge Trump $20k/day for representation. Plus all of the earned media on OAN, Newsmax, etc .
Wood is still out there making crazy claims (like about Justice Roberts) that he has provided absolutely ZERO proof for. I'm not going to take his word on anything when he's calling Roberts an Epstein-friendly, child trafficking pedophile. You can't just make shit up and expect reasonable people to believe it without evidence.
Ultimately, I think it was grift, the lime-light, and the adoration of Trump. Even Powell got laughed out of the White House in the final weeks, with even Trump reportedly calling her fucking crazy.
Yet no lawsuits have been filed against Lin...until they are filed I'll believe his accusations.
He posted the emails from Pence/Ryan on their strategy for Trump. I believe he has evidence. The Roberts thing is tricky as pedophilia is hard to prove without getting yourself in trouble, right?
I don't know. These are three highly intelligent people who knew the consequences of their actions. It's hard for me to believe they'd destroy their lives without knowing the truth.
Just my 2 cents.
I'm not of the mindset to believe people making claims without evidence.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. And he has yet to provide it.
They did forensic analysis on a Michigan machine and DO have the evidence .
....but none of this will ever come out. It will all be sealed by the blackmailed/bribed judges.
What court case do you mean where they couldn't show it? All i heard was that no court wanted evidence to be presented
You heard correctly.
Every case was dismissed on procedural grounds; no evidence has ever been presented to a court.
No court had an evidentiary hearing
Every case dismissed on procedural grounds.