The game changed; aggregate success is no longer measured in terms of individual survival--technological force multipliers saw to that. Now the game--in so far as there is one at all--is to advance technology to the point where humans can escape what is inherently a doomed single planet. Hypergamy precludes that goal; by contrast, monogamy (and the contribution of all males, not just the top 20% of males-as judged by the reptilian component of the female brain) is virtually required. It solves a problem.
Hypergamy means marrying upwards. It does indeed hinder technological advancement by screwing up reproduction success... for high status women.
Female brain is much better at selection than you seem to imagine. It's got us this far and selects for more than the ability to kill a mammoth. If you fail to (or don't even try to) meet its minimal requirements for health or confidence, the problem is not her.
Contemporary rate of failure to reproduce (childlessness) is like 20% for men, not 80%. If anything, there is not enough selection pressure.
If you fail to (or don't even try to) meet its minimal requirements for health or confidence
Imagine actually being under the impression that an overwrought way of saying Have Sex Incel would pass as an argument or sentiment worthy of consideration anywhere outside of /pol/.
Contemporary hypergamy is more than just mate selection (I trust you have the health and confidence levels to understand); as our society is still fundamentally based around violence and coercion layered around cooperation (as all are), the changes in system brought about by feminist subversion of the legal processes (that's the violence and coercion) surrounding formalized monogamy are the danger, alongside the propaganda of hyper-sexualization soaking youth-oriented media.
But it's ok, it'll be fine, mate. You'll have a blast losing the house, your bank account, the kids, the alimony, watching your daughters do pills and fuck aspiring rappers for the IG likes.
The game changed; aggregate success is no longer measured in terms of individual survival--technological force multipliers saw to that. Now the game--in so far as there is one at all--is to advance technology to the point where humans can escape what is inherently a doomed single planet. Hypergamy precludes that goal; by contrast, monogamy (and the contribution of all males, not just the top 20% of males-as judged by the reptilian component of the female brain) is virtually required. It solves a problem.
The planet isn't doomed.
Hypergamy means marrying upwards. It does indeed hinder technological advancement by screwing up reproduction success... for high status women.
Female brain is much better at selection than you seem to imagine. It's got us this far and selects for more than the ability to kill a mammoth. If you fail to (or don't even try to) meet its minimal requirements for health or confidence, the problem is not her.
Contemporary rate of failure to reproduce (childlessness) is like 20% for men, not 80%. If anything, there is not enough selection pressure.
Imagine actually being under the impression that an overwrought way of saying Have Sex Incel would pass as an argument or sentiment worthy of consideration anywhere outside of /pol/.
Contemporary hypergamy is more than just mate selection (I trust you have the health and confidence levels to understand); as our society is still fundamentally based around violence and coercion layered around cooperation (as all are), the changes in system brought about by feminist subversion of the legal processes (that's the violence and coercion) surrounding formalized monogamy are the danger, alongside the propaganda of hyper-sexualization soaking youth-oriented media.
But it's ok, it'll be fine, mate. You'll have a blast losing the house, your bank account, the kids, the alimony, watching your daughters do pills and fuck aspiring rappers for the IG likes.
More like "don't be a wimp", you are entitled to nothing in this world. But whatever.
The legal traps are ridiculous, I agree.
Are you confusing the word "hypergamy" with "polygamy"?