4440
Comments (310)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
645
BasedNJDeplorable 645 points ago +647 / -2

They will probably say somebody was trying to help Trump

457
VarusSPQR 457 points ago +457 / -0

That’s precisely what this is about. More smokescreen to benefit the Commies.

101
War_Hamster 101 points ago +103 / -2

I was thinking this could be interpreted either way.

147
deleted 147 points ago +148 / -1
53
O__Q 53 points ago +53 / -0
  • Watchdog = DOJ OIG = Official-est Fact-Checker In Existence = Litteral Ability To Create, Erase, And Replace Truth By Decree = There Has Never Been, Nor Will Ever Be A More Trustworthy Arbiter Of Factual Facts

  • Which means this "investigation" will lay THE OFFICIAL, UNQUESTIONABLE narrative foundation they desperately need to build upon for (likely) decades to come.

  • It will provide the MSM and every leftist with an endless supply of Truth-Armor-Piercing Auto-DEBOOOONK-Grade™ silver bullets, that can be used to effortlessly execute literally any historical accounts that the Xiden regime disapproves of.

22
War_Hamster 22 points ago +23 / -1

I try to avoid assumptions altogether, when I can.

14
GlacialSpeed 14 points ago +14 / -0

Just more confirmation of who our real enemies are.

2
CahalTheMad 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's always been my philosophy, and I get called a "pessimist" for it.

1
CloudIX 1 point ago +1 / -0

But if I assume the worst, I'm immediately disappointed.

54
Recyclops 54 points ago +54 / -0

Horowitz is the swamp rat that "did not find political bias during the investigation of Trump and Russia, nor did he find evidence that the FBI attempted to place people inside the Trump campaign or report on the Trump campaign."

His wife is also a CNN producer. So, there's that too.

13
Pepedepede 13 points ago +13 / -0

Well, let's throw this in the trash then.

What it means:

We will investigate whether any DOJ official tried to overturn the election.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +7 / -2

All of that is true, but Horowitz did play exactly by the rules they have given him. Even though he painstakingly avoided uncovering the whole truth, his report(s) were still pretty useful. What I'm saying is that there are different levels of corruption, and some "public servants" still pay lip service to actually doing their jobs. Plus, the truth is on our side and that tends to come out eventually.

3
DickTick 3 points ago +3 / -0

You misunderstand the teeny tiny scope in which they allowed Horowitz to run his investigation with....

they did that on purpose so as to make it seem like his report cleared them when in fact it didn't because his investigation barely even scratched the fucking paint layer on the surface of what all actually went down and most of the malfeasance wasn't carried out under the people/departments that he was specifically investigating.

He did not have the ability to dig or follow leads....

So as far as I'm aware he did not stab us in the back and was simply trying to work within the confines of his scope and the law...

2
Olds77 2 points ago +2 / -0

And he didn't confirm the opposite either. I appreciated Horowitz's report as it was much more than I was expecting. He wanted a further investigation and here we are still waiting on Durham.

43
PewPew_ThaDuK 43 points ago +43 / -0

if the doj is taking action, its never to help give clarity. Its always to obfuscate what really happened

35
richmomz 35 points ago +35 / -0

Or in this case, to purge anyone who dares to raise questions about election fraud.

17
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 17 points ago +17 / -0

The DOJ has made it crystal clear which side they are on, and it isn't our side.

16
richmomz 16 points ago +16 / -0

This is the same agency that was handing weapons to drug cartels like free candy under Obama, after all.

11
Onlywayoutisthrough 11 points ago +11 / -0

No no and Nope....

Only when the Left has power do these fucktards do anything. IRS Scandal, Eric Holder was Obama's wingman, surveillance of private US citizens, and way more than I can type.

When GEOTUS was there, they could not get off their arse to do squat. Antifa, BLM riots, leakers, tweekers and traitors like John "Let me be clear there will be no peace in the middle east without Palestine" Kerry...

30
Whoopies_tds 30 points ago +30 / -0

This 👆 and that 👆👆

IG scope does not include the fraud committed by States and at best would only expose anyone attempting to be transparent against the Deepstate strategy for one party rule.

4
Trump_USA_2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

Communist is like a cancer that never stops spreading.

2
Olds77 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes and trying to work up hysteria for their Trump impeachment. The DOJ had no problem lying for 2 years about Mueller and Russian Collusion. I think this may be an attempt to derail Durham or get in front of it.

1
NZ_needs_a_Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

In some ways it's good. They wouldn't do the smokescreen if they thought the results of local elections were going to come out. The illegality of the mail in changes already happening in some states, more will come out. They held off until after the election so they could get Biden in, and now need a cover because there's nothing to stop the cases.

42
Slayenemy909 42 points ago +42 / -0

this is what I'm expecting

30
Sea_Still 30 points ago +30 / -0

Those pesky imaginary Russians again no doubt

13
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's part of the purge to root out and punish Trump supporters and anyone who supports the Constitution and rule of law.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
Gmama2 19 points ago +19 / -0

Of course, the entire FBI can set up honey pots, use false information to pretend he colluded with russia, ignore Hunter's laptop, etc, Antifa, not look into massive vote fraud, but if someone at the DOJ whispered to their spouse they were voting for Trump....

16
JimmyJam 16 points ago +16 / -0

yeah, Rudy. He was a former DOJ prosecutor.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
JimmyJam 2 points ago +2 / -0

it says "former" DOJ employees. Doesn't specify when.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0