756
posted ago by Eric-CIA-ramella ago by Eric-CIA-ramella +758 / -2

I think a lot of pedes are shortsighted when it comes to the third party angle. It's ineffective and splintering is not an attractive quality to the retard average American voter, especially when the media / big tech falsely tell them 24/7 that Dems provide familiarity and comfortability.

A third party literally leads to a split that got Woodrow Wilson and Bill Clinton into office.

The only REAL answer is secession from the Federal States of America. And by secession I mean a legislature induced secession by true liberty-loving Republican states into a new union with the correct strategic resources and geographical assets.

FIRST secession, THEN war - if it must be.

Comments (62)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Eric-CIA-ramella [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sorry, meant the House. Republicans in House were already outnumbered, Senate is completely different story, they just sat on their asses because muh GOPe obviously.

I still disagree because Trump got VERY far with it, despite the GOPe throwing everything they had at him. The ultimate reason being the voters demanded him in primaries, and GOPe had to concede in defeat. I believe the same appeal to The People can over rule very ineffective GOPe rulership in the same sense.

It's not like it's unknown that the GOP is a far more incompetent machine than the DNC is.

4
TwistedSister 4 points ago +4 / -0

You aren't going to get anybody to vote for the GOP. That cow is out of the barn.

2
Eric-CIA-ramella [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

We're not talking about voting "for the GOP". We're talking about the non GOPe establishment voting to leave the Union. On the state level it is completely feasible despite whatever you're saying.

3
TwistedSister 3 points ago +3 / -0

We're talking about the non GOPe establishment voting to leave the Union

All five of them?

On the state level it is completely feasible despite whatever you're saying.

You said the only way to accomplish it is with war. I said if you think you can do it without politics, you've already lost.

1
Eric-CIA-ramella [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Never said that,

FIRST secession, THEN war - if it must be.

Are you conflating a legislative war with a physical war...with the GOP? At that point what are you even talking about? Physical war against the GOP?