https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-do-you-solve-a-problem-like-qanon/
"Any attempt to rein in Righty conspiracy theorists and make them actually useful will have to consider their actual interests and aptitudes. And they have them. Many of them are backbone-of-America types: they have jobs, have family lives, and are actively engaged in their communities in various ways. They turn out to events and meetings. They’re genuinely enthusiastic. They’re hard workers. They’re curious about the world and passionate to make a difference in it. They are genuinely interested in learning about things that aren’t immediately obvious. It’s just that they learn them from random YouTube videos because they don’t know how to use PACER to find court records, or how to file FOIA applications to get government documents, or how to look up Form 990s to learn about how nonprofits are organized and funded.
…but what if they did know those things?"
North Korea and Saudi. Iran. Hunter is now hunted. These people are sick. The fact that voter fraud was coming. Nothing, huh?
Just because it doesn't play out the way you or I had hoped doesn't make that nothing. I'm as bummed as you are that Trump let this scumbag steal his rightful office. But that's no reason to ignore the fact that there is a track record of cases where there have been hits.
See, here's the thing. You live and you learn. You make mistakes in interpreting the world. And you grow from them. Q shouldn't be treated like a god or a prophet. Q is a set of clues and wisdom is realizing that the clues aren't going to always fit your expectations.
What valuable research have any of these people done? Something that's made a difference outside of Q world, changed the course of any current events or taken a scalp.
Sharing screenshots of screenshots about Italian election interference does not count.
What valuable research? Do you think you'd know anything if it wasn't for anonymous people digging? Who found the PA voting timelines and shared it with the Trump community? You think that's your doing? You wouldn't even know Joe had stolen the election if the anons weren't watching.
Oh, by the way, they've been using PACER for 3 and a half years. It's how they got the count of "sealed indictments."
The election shenanigans were not exactly a secret, and Biden was still certified the winner of PA, so whatever they found did not make a substantive difference.
"Sealed indictments" is like a 5 year old LARP at this point.
Disinformation rule #14 "Demand complete solutions"
So your argument is basically "People trying to do things means nothing, unless I get the results I wanted they're a LARP." Have fun with that.