You really should watch some Steve Bannon before his arrest in March of 2020. When he was talking mad smack about kissinger and the ccp. This was before his arrest.. after his arrest he went silent on kissinger.
So your saying if Chinese nationalist rose up and took down the ccp, crony capatalist and zionist neo cons would not still be a problem for america? who sent all our jobs over to China to begin with? Was it not Ronald Reagan and Henry Kissinger. And who was friendly with the CCP in 1921 again?
"Crony Capitalist" as in Socialist? Marxists? Globalist? Authoritarians? Kleptocrats? Aristocrats? Plutocrats?
This is like calling something "sexual intercourse with only unidirectional agreement" rather than "rape."
None of that has anything to do with Capitalism, as it does not PROMOTE THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE ACTIONS, YET EVERYTHING YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT ARE GOVERNMENT ACTIONS.
Calling it "Crony Capitalism" merely serves to pull something into the mud. The same people who complain about it also reject Free Market Capitalism as they see no difference.
Some people also consider China as a "State Capitalism." That's not a thing either - it serves to make people comfortable with the thought of government running your lives and connect Capitalism with the idea of authoritarianism.
Even if you yourself don't think like this - Socialists of all types do this though. It's kind of a linguistic game. Propaganda. I also don't refer to leftists or Democrats as "Liberals," because they rejected every single thing that relates to liberty long ago. They are simply Marxists. And no, Marxists do not have to be well educated (=indoctrinated), it's sufficient if they are useful idiots.
Playing devil's advocate, but that's not true. A crony capitalistic society does not necessarily imply oligarchy nor plutocracy, nor vice versa. They are independent concepts regarding societal control and economic control. For example, libertarian systems tend toward crony capitalism even if those capitalists don't have any political control. An example would be a pure direct democracy.
Capitalism is not the issue socialism is the problem and the whole notion of some having to sort out who pays for others, you never see these people who are asking for the money, as being the first to pay up, because they are the ones doing the work so they should also contribute to the coffer well that seems unfair in their mind.
And i am saying this as a Dane with a very Socialist mentality in our country we all pay taxes in the 50% range most of us that is some have a better tax write off and end around 40%-43% and they also wanted to tax the rich more depending on what political party holds office, and all that would do would be to cause an exodus again of companies to the likes of China and India.
The horrid shit will never end until crony capatalist and zionist are defeated... ftfy
I'm guessing you are CCP.
Who supported the TPP? Was it skull n bones buddies fred smith and John kerry with the help of bush crony's or was it all just Obama?
You really should watch some Steve Bannon before his arrest in March of 2020. When he was talking mad smack about kissinger and the ccp. This was before his arrest.. after his arrest he went silent on kissinger.
So your saying if Chinese nationalist rose up and took down the ccp, crony capatalist and zionist neo cons would not still be a problem for america? who sent all our jobs over to China to begin with? Was it not Ronald Reagan and Henry Kissinger. And who was friendly with the CCP in 1921 again?
nope Zionism is a big problem and cause of all USA strife
"Crony Capitalist" as in Socialist? Marxists? Globalist? Authoritarians? Kleptocrats? Aristocrats? Plutocrats?
This is like calling something "sexual intercourse with only unidirectional agreement" rather than "rape."
None of that has anything to do with Capitalism, as it does not PROMOTE THE GOVERNMENT TO TAKE ACTIONS, YET EVERYTHING YOU COMPLAIN ABOUT ARE GOVERNMENT ACTIONS.
Dude look up the word Crony Capitalist
"close, mutually advantageous relationships between business leaders and government officials"
That's what I am against not capatalism but insider business deals and nepotism!
That's called Oligarchy or Plutocracy.
Calling it "Crony Capitalism" merely serves to pull something into the mud. The same people who complain about it also reject Free Market Capitalism as they see no difference.
Some people also consider China as a "State Capitalism." That's not a thing either - it serves to make people comfortable with the thought of government running your lives and connect Capitalism with the idea of authoritarianism.
Even if you yourself don't think like this - Socialists of all types do this though. It's kind of a linguistic game. Propaganda. I also don't refer to leftists or Democrats as "Liberals," because they rejected every single thing that relates to liberty long ago. They are simply Marxists. And no, Marxists do not have to be well educated (=indoctrinated), it's sufficient if they are useful idiots.
Playing devil's advocate, but that's not true. A crony capitalistic society does not necessarily imply oligarchy nor plutocracy, nor vice versa. They are independent concepts regarding societal control and economic control. For example, libertarian systems tend toward crony capitalism even if those capitalists don't have any political control. An example would be a pure direct democracy.
Okay thanks, I understand what your saying, crony capatalism is what leftist socialist say. Plutocracy or Corporatocracy is more accurate
Capitalism is not the issue socialism is the problem and the whole notion of some having to sort out who pays for others, you never see these people who are asking for the money, as being the first to pay up, because they are the ones doing the work so they should also contribute to the coffer well that seems unfair in their mind.
And i am saying this as a Dane with a very Socialist mentality in our country we all pay taxes in the 50% range most of us that is some have a better tax write off and end around 40%-43% and they also wanted to tax the rich more depending on what political party holds office, and all that would do would be to cause an exodus again of companies to the likes of China and India.