5217
Comments (738)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
164
TheOne1 164 points ago +174 / -10

Many of these techniques are being employed here on a regular basis. We are constantly flooded with shills and trolls, and then there are agents at work inside doing these things listed in the post. This is why it's important that the forum not be allowed to get out of control. Those screaming the loudest about deportations being censorship are most likely agents or at least are willing to derail the conversation for their own ends. Then there are those who either obliquely or directly call for violent actions. These are the most dangerous and must get the ban hammer as fast as possible. Even if they are just pissed off patriots, this is not the forum for such discussions, nor is it the place to organize them.

63
joetraincool [S] 63 points ago +65 / -2

I agree with your evaluation on deportations from the forum, but conflating defending our Republic via use of force as violence is a narrative perpetrated by Pravda, INC., not patriots. I am not committing violence if I defend my home from invaders using force, nor is it the case for those defending their Republic.

1
TheOne1 1 point ago +11 / -10

I wan't talking about saying you will defend your home, there are people calling for outright civil war. that is what I referred to. My saying that they can have my guns bullets first, is not advocating a violent overthrow of government. That is a discussion for another place.

18
Elvathelion 18 points ago +20 / -2

I call for those who swore an oath and serve in our government and military to fulfill their duty - failing that? There's only so many ways this can progress because an illegitimate government has a terminal disease. It's called being cornered or pushed too far - only so many ways to counter that - rolling over and acceptance? That's not something many will consider an option. Of course, our enemies want this, they want their self fulfilling prophetic declaration of MAGA being their dangerous enemy to come true - at this juncture they are likely to get more than they bargained for... But they are the enemy, always have been. Time for honesty. Globalist sponsored traitors have stolen our Republic - political process is dead.

1
LordOfTheReeeeengs 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'm 100% with you. If we can't have legitimate elections moving forward, esp since the swamp is looking to make all the cheating legalized, what other options are there? Run for local offices? Run for senate/house seats? As if they will let a non-swamp creature into the devil club they've created. I think it's time this site faces the reality that the only way forward is a likely a violent one. I never thought I would have ever advocated for this but we are at the point of no return and if I want to make sure my kids never have to bend their knee to communism or wait in breadlines, I plan to protect them and this nations constitution from terrorism/tyranny, both foreign and domestic.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sure, but revolutionary talk on an open forum is a bad idea.

12
KurtHawks5124 12 points ago +15 / -3

"this is not the forum for such discussions, nor is it the place to organize them."

Then tell me what is, 90% of sites outside here is compromised and full of censorship, Just asking.

17
Jaqen 17 points ago +18 / -1

You make a good point, there are few websites that allow us to speak our minds.

But some conversations are best had privately, not publicly. Use the right tool for the job.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
5
CyclopticErotica 5 points ago +8 / -3

Be 100% certain that we are all on a FBI list and every word we say is analyzed to be used against us daily with the ultimate goal to knock on your door and end your citizenship. You can do whatever you want with that reality, but it should inform your actions somewhat in conversations you have on a public forum known to be monitored by the enemy.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +3 / -2

Please explain what you mean. I do not follow you.

Were the plans of any army, who participated in any battle, throughout history, broadcast to the public beforehand? I am not aware of any such occurrences. It would seem like tactical suicide to publicly discuss such plans.

I am not well versed in military history though. Perhaps this happens and I am just not aware of it. My understanding is that such matters are always discussed privately along a chain of command on a need to know basis.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
gamexa 2 points ago +3 / -1

One not hosted in the United States, for a start.

0
Graycliff 0 points ago +1 / -1

Or China, lest it need be said.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
KingSweyn 0 points ago +4 / -4

Go to donor.watch

Find other Trump supporters in your area (you'll only find those who put their money where there mouth is)

Organize weekly meetings

Practice your skills and strengths together

Decide for yourselves

3
CyclopticErotica 3 points ago +4 / -1

"Hi, you don't know me, but I saw you donated to Trump. Want to meet up with a stranger?"

Antifa tried to set up a "Trump meet" on /r/portland back in the day. Luckily nobody fell for it.

5
AtTheInauguration 5 points ago +6 / -1

Seriously, don't meet/organize with ANYBODY from online. You WILL go to jail.

You want to know where to find likeminded patriots? Go to fucking church.

And not any of that gay liberal rainbow flag waving methodist shit. Find some real angry baptist motherfuckers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
JoePlumber 2 points ago +3 / -1

How do we stop it though? Because I have seen based handshake accounts as well. There's always going to be more based people out there to get to join here but that leaves it open to bad guys. How can this even be combatted effectively?

1
RiseOfTyranny 1 point ago +2 / -1

Handshake =/= shill

Some things just require experience. Stay skeptical of EVERY account.

1
JoePlumber 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's exactly what I'm saying. We could shut down handshakes but then we couldn't grow. The shills come with allowing the handshakes and we just have to stay vigilant.

1
RiseOfTyranny 1 point ago +2 / -1

Shills are already here with convincing accounts. It's not hard to pretend to be in support of transparent elections and occasionally employ the above tactics. Sure the obvious ones are usually handshakes but you'll have a lot of trouble spotting those gunning for a mod position.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1