Its focus on police, its verbosity, its talk about "eco-peace", and its approach, makes me somewhat wary of it. Also that I have seen some suspicious accounts link to it. But at least some of the information checks out.
Also, if this kind of information is posted on imageboards (and posted there long ago), might it not make sense to greatly encourage people to visit imageboards (in a smart way, of course, such as by using ad-blockers if necessary)?
So there's definitely a number of things to be wary of, and the fact that you discourage fully warranted skepticism is not a good sign.
And again (in case you are distracting from this part):
Also, if this kind of information is posted on imageboards (and posted there long ago), might it not make sense to greatly encourage people to visit imageboards (in a smart way, of course, such as by using ad-blockers if necessary)?
Quite the opposite, did you read any of it?
I was responding directly to the person before me in the thread re: patience, not to you.
My apologies, I see now.
Its focus on police, its verbosity, its talk about "eco-peace", and its approach, makes me somewhat wary of it. Also that I have seen some suspicious accounts link to it. But at least some of the information checks out.
Also, if this kind of information is posted on imageboards (and posted there long ago), might it not make sense to greatly encourage people to visit imageboards (in a smart way, of course, such as by using ad-blockers if necessary)?
So there's definitely a number of things to be wary of, and the fact that you discourage fully warranted skepticism is not a good sign.
And again (in case you are distracting from this part):
Also, if this kind of information is posted on imageboards (and posted there long ago), might it not make sense to greatly encourage people to visit imageboards (in a smart way, of course, such as by using ad-blockers if necessary)?