Hello,
We've reviewed your request, and we didn't find grounds to restrict the URL(s) at issue under our legal policies. For more information, please visit our help center.
We encourage you to try to resolve any issues directly with the creator of the content in question. Some users list ways they can be contacted in their channel. Learn more about how to contact other users here.
If you choose to pursue legal action against the content creator, note that we may be prepared to comply with an order requiring the content creator to remove the posting in question.
For more information about our removal processes, please visit our Reporting and Enforcement Center.
Regards,
The YouTube Legal Support Team
This was the original complaint credit to u/ol_Gravy_Leg for providing case law information
Specific law: Case 18-1691-cv Knight First Amendment Institute, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
Hyperlink of specific law: https://knightcolumbia.org/documents/a07ecc2a26/2019.07.09_ECF-141-1_Opinion.pdf
video url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSHrXLm9-Tc
How does content violate law: In July of 2019 the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that "by preventing critics from accessing his feed, the president is barring them from participating in what the judges deemed a public forum." Since this channel is the official White House channel, and is used "to conduct official business and to interact with the public", it cannot have it's comment section turned off. This is a US government content provider . By blocking comments, they/YouTube are violating first amendment rights.
Why should they? The law is irrelevant now and nobody should care about it.
If you're targeted, the law won't save you. If you're favored, the law won't touch you.
Yup. And these elected cocksuckers no longer fear our vote either.