Have you given financial support to any of these parents?
Have you donated your free time to help care for those children?
If your answer is no to both of the questions
Then your virtue signaling is obvious.
One does not have to financially contribute to families with disabled children to assert the moral claim it is wrong to kill a baby because of a defect.
Are Down’s syndrome children an incredible burden on their family? Absolutely.
Is it right to kill the baby before it’s born to avoid that? One is not a “virtue signaler” for saying that it is wrong.
This is a free country though isn’t it? Every right that the government takes control of should be heavily scrutinized. Some people may wish to avoid the burden, so taking that right from them is against the liberty of free peoples
Sorry, killing babies is never the right answer.
Have you given financial support to any of these parents? Have you donated your free time to help care for those children? If your answer is no to both of the questions Then your virtue signaling is obvious.
Hard disagree.
One does not have to financially contribute to families with disabled children to assert the moral claim it is wrong to kill a baby because of a defect.
Are Down’s syndrome children an incredible burden on their family? Absolutely.
Is it right to kill the baby before it’s born to avoid that? One is not a “virtue signaler” for saying that it is wrong.
This is a free country though isn’t it? Every right that the government takes control of should be heavily scrutinized. Some people may wish to avoid the burden, so taking that right from them is against the liberty of free peoples