970
Comments (136)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
29
CanadianTrump 29 points ago +30 / -1

this. It is NEVER fair for the child or other in those videos / photos to be public knowledge.

9
MustBeTrump 9 points ago +9 / -0

The amount that you would have to censor would be so much that you probably couldn't even tell that it's a child.

5
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 5 points ago +8 / -3

What's the point? We can't even convince Q-LARPers that a video of President Trump conceding isn't a deep fake. How would we convince normies that a video of Hillary Clinton cutting the face off of a child and wearing it is real?

2
Hunter1970 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm just saying, they didn't release any bloopers or behind the scenes footage, and they don't release bloopers or behind the scenes footage for deep fakes either. Coincidence?

9
45ichooseu 9 points ago +13 / -4

100% this! Ive been deporting the hunter photos as often as possible, even if they're blurred out. This material is unacceptable. Seems our community agrees this is not acceptable too because the threads get deleted quickly. Just yesterday I tried to report one and it was gone before I could report it.

3
AmericaFloats 3 points ago +3 / -0

there's already enough evidence in the public forum, we don't need to ruin more lives of victims, i agree.

so blur the faces and release the images of the perps.

we don't want rumors and 'knowing they're guilty'

we want actionable, legal, sentencing.