His argument (for certifying fraudulent electors) is basically it repulses him to have the federal level of government subvert the will of the states. I get it, I understand his angle but IF NOT THEN, IN THAT MOMENT, IN THIS SITUATION, then when Rand?
His argument (for certifying fraudulent electors) is basically it repulses him to have the federal level of government subvert the will of the states. I get it, I understand his angle but IF NOT THEN, IN THAT MOMENT, IN THIS SITUATION, then when Rand?
He let perfect be the enemy of good.