kek. TRUST SESSIONS! 1253 DIVIDED BY .1032 EQUALS 12141.47 WHICH IS THE AMOUNT OF BITES IT TAKES FOR TRUMP TO FINISH A TACO BOWL WHICH MEANS Q IS REAL! WWG1WGA!
Tabled a motion by Rand Paul to vote on whether the impeachment is constitutional. 45 Republicans wanted to vote on constitutionality. 50 Democrats + 5 Republicans didn't want to vote on whether it is constitutional. So tabling is a loss for the Republicans, but it does show that only 5 Republicans seem to want to plow forward with this nonsense, which won't be enough to convict (so probably a win for Trump overall).
This post could have used a lot more context than just a title and a photo.
They tabled a motion by Rand Paul that would have (at least temporarily) stopped the impeachment trial from going forward. Since it was tabled, the trial will go forward. Rand Paul's motion wouldn't be relevant in 2 years (after the trial).
I think 5 R voted against Rand and the idea the impeachment is unconstitutional. Trump is already impeached, that was done in the house. Then Senate does the trial and Rand was trying to say the impeachment itself was unconstitutional (already passed, he is impeached but not yet tried).
So 5 republicans dont think the already approved impeachment is unconstitutional. They may believe him innocent, that is unknown and seperate.
In reality, trump wants a world stage to present evidence. So this helps him.
I just got Don Jr.'s Telegram video explaining exactly this. Rand forced a vote to basically flesh out the reality that they don't have enough votes to make it happen, so when they continue ahead anyway they look bad for pettily wasting everyone's time and money on a grudge match when real issues like job creation etc should be the focus.
Utah faggots who vote for him solely based on him being a Mormon. Low IQ morons who keep voting for a Rhino simply based off his religion instead of his polices and allegiance to the will of the people.
Whatever McConnell is doing, you can rest assured he's thought it through. I'm not saying I always agree with him but I usually do, and sometimes when I think he's being a moron, it later turns out he was doing his thing. He's a shrewd motherfucker.
The Senate voted 55-45 to set aside Paul's motion, with all but five GOP senators siding with Paul. GOP Sens. Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Pat Toomey (Pa.) voted with Democrats to table Paul's point of order.
In Collins case, we're lucky to have her instead of another Dem. At least there's a chance she will go with the Reps on something.
Romney and Murkowski I don't understand at all, at this point, how they stay (or will remain) in office. Sasse is kind of a libertarian (the annoying kind, sometimes :D), but I can at least understand where the voters were coming from with him.
So 5 rinos voted for it
You mean communist insurgents
THIS is what we're calling them now.
add 'faggots' for flair if you like.
Communist Infaggents
They will never impeach Trump because he is playing GOOD COP.
Fagrancy
Someone on GA.win said they hate thedonald because he always gets called a faggot.
I had to be the voice of reason... "well pal, are you a faggot?"
rolls eyes Don't they know that Faggot is our word for 'numpty'.
kek. TRUST SESSIONS! 1253 DIVIDED BY .1032 EQUALS 12141.47 WHICH IS THE AMOUNT OF BITES IT TAKES FOR TRUMP TO FINISH A TACO BOWL WHICH MEANS Q IS REAL! WWG1WGA!
Rhinos who voted for: “I’m sorry. It’s just that the whores that Pelosi bought us as a reward were too damn good. I mean they swallowed everything!”
damn
Redundancy is for the left
The left invented the department of redundancy department
my bad
Irving Kristol and all the offspring of his loins and his mind are rebranded Bolsheviks, change my mind.
The correct term is collaborator.
I bet you can guess at least one of those names right off the bat.
Globalist*
No, 5 or more democrats voted AGAINST considering the point of order any further... That's what "table" means... Means kill it
Edit: This was a motion by Rand Paul.
So in fact, 5 Republicans did vote IN FAVOR of Impeachment (by way of shutting down Paul's obstruction).
But the headline is reading into the votes to infer that ONLY 5 Republicans will vote to convict, when 17 will be needed.
So it's not DOA, there will be a trial, etc. It's just that in the final vote, there is unlikely to be a conviction.
Tabled a motion by Rand Paul to vote on whether the impeachment is constitutional. 45 Republicans wanted to vote on constitutionality. 50 Democrats + 5 Republicans didn't want to vote on whether it is constitutional. So tabling is a loss for the Republicans, but it does show that only 5 Republicans seem to want to plow forward with this nonsense, which won't be enough to convict (so probably a win for Trump overall).
This post could have used a lot more context than just a title and a photo.
Every one of them needs to be primaried, regardless.
Which Republicans voted for this motion?
Lmao, they didn’t want to consider if it were constitutional? 🤡
This is better for us IMO. A busy Senate during the impeachment will not get much passed from the House.
Why is that even an option?! It should be mandatory, anyone who voted no should be jailed for contempt.
Any idea who the 5 are?
Sens. Mitt Romney (Utah)
Ben Sasse (Neb.)
Susan Collins (Maine)
Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)
Pat Toomey (Pa.)
Five primary losers.
By tabling it does that mean the could bring it back up in 2 years?
They tabled a motion by Rand Paul that would have (at least temporarily) stopped the impeachment trial from going forward. Since it was tabled, the trial will go forward. Rand Paul's motion wouldn't be relevant in 2 years (after the trial).
Thank you for the explanation.
You're welcome.
Think they were tabling something paul introduced
Right... So in fact, 5 Republicans did in fact vote IN FAVOR of Impeachment (by way of shutting down Paul's obstruction).
But the headline is reading into the votes to infer that ONLY 5 Republicans will vote to convict, when 17 will be needed.
So it's not DOA, there will be a trial, etc. It's just that in the final vote, there is unlikely to be a conviction.
I think 5 R voted against Rand and the idea the impeachment is unconstitutional. Trump is already impeached, that was done in the house. Then Senate does the trial and Rand was trying to say the impeachment itself was unconstitutional (already passed, he is impeached but not yet tried).
So 5 republicans dont think the already approved impeachment is unconstitutional. They may believe him innocent, that is unknown and seperate.
In reality, trump wants a world stage to present evidence. So this helps him.
Makes sense fuck those rinos
We don’t call them democrats anymore. They’re either socialists or the communists. Please take note.
Socialists are just Communists that don't know they are Communists.
I think calling them tyrants is the most descriptive, that way it'll also include the neocons.
Traitors maybe?
I just got Don Jr.'s Telegram video explaining exactly this. Rand forced a vote to basically flesh out the reality that they don't have enough votes to make it happen, so when they continue ahead anyway they look bad for pettily wasting everyone's time and money on a grudge match when real issues like job creation etc should be the focus.
yup. good thing is 45 will vote to block it. this was a great test vote to check who will vote for conviction and against conviction.
Uniparty gonna uniparty.
Who? Mitten, Turtle, ...
Sasse, Collins, Murkowski, Romney, and Toomey.
Romney is such a flaming faggot, HOW DOES HE GET ELECTED
because Trump endorsed him.
Mormon mafia. And his niece runs the DNC.
Utah faggots who vote for him solely based on him being a Mormon. Low IQ morons who keep voting for a Rhino simply based off his religion instead of his polices and allegiance to the will of the people.
He cheats.
same way biden did
Amazing. So McConnell gassed up this impeachment and then voted in favor of the motion to table it? What a fucking jackass.
“Well, you see, it’s important to compromise... sometimes I vote to commit treason.. sometimes I don’t... you can’t win ‘em all. “
🤡
Whatever McConnell is doing, you can rest assured he's thought it through. I'm not saying I always agree with him but I usually do, and sometimes when I think he's being a moron, it later turns out he was doing his thing. He's a shrewd motherfucker.
No turtle? Changed his tune
That surprised me too until I got to thinking just how well he plays dirty politics. He may be trying to draw this out as long as possible.
Basically all of the usual suspects minus McConnell
The Senate voted 55-45 to set aside Paul's motion, with all but five GOP senators siding with Paul. GOP Sens. Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Pat Toomey (Pa.) voted with Democrats to table Paul's point of order.
The typical RINO suspects.
Collins and Sasse were just reelected too. Why do we keep making these mistakes?
Because we sleep during the primaries and never run good opposition.
Palin can see her next job in government from her house!
really still have to ask?
In Collins case, we're lucky to have her instead of another Dem. At least there's a chance she will go with the Reps on something.
Romney and Murkowski I don't understand at all, at this point, how they stay (or will remain) in office. Sasse is kind of a libertarian (the annoying kind, sometimes :D), but I can at least understand where the voters were coming from with him.
What?!? At this point what makes you think people are still fairly electing anyone?
That cunt from Maine?
Delecto, Collins, Toomey, Murkowski and Sasse.
Sens. Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Pat Toomey (Pa.)
You can probably guess which five... 🙄
Inky, Winky, Blinky, Dinky, and Pinky
the usual suspects
What about Clyde?
never bring up clyde damnit