The Chief Justice of the SCOTUS said "Nope, not constitutional, not coming to the party" already - so the opinion of the SCOTUS is it's a sham. And as compromised as spineless as Roberts is, when even he says "fuck no, lol", you know it's all bullshit.
Precedent has fuck all to do with it, no judge, no impeachment.
How is it constitutional to impeach a president who's not president anymore? Everything I've read said it's not. Did they just set precedence though?
The Chief Justice of the SCOTUS said "Nope, not constitutional, not coming to the party" already - so the opinion of the SCOTUS is it's a sham. And as compromised as spineless as Roberts is, when even he says "fuck no, lol", you know it's all bullshit.
Precedent has fuck all to do with it, no judge, no impeachment.
Did he say no or was he not even invited?
Hes invited via the constitution. He doesn't need an eVite.