It is true it’s not a typical “vaccine” which uses dead or weakened viruses to create antibodies. Two of the covid shots uses rna to create spike proteins on the cells or another one enters the nucleus and causes the cell to replicate the spike proteins. But I believe the manufacturers are still under blanket immunity as this was done under the “plandemic”. Though I could be incorrect.
is that why Mersk stopped making it?????
Almost certainly imo
I'd bet. Although the claim that simply being the virus is more effective isn't wrong either
Sadly under current federal law you can not hold vaccine manufacturers accountable for any vaccine injury including death.
Someone on here said something about it not being a vaccine that would fall under that liability law.
It is true it’s not a typical “vaccine” which uses dead or weakened viruses to create antibodies. Two of the covid shots uses rna to create spike proteins on the cells or another one enters the nucleus and causes the cell to replicate the spike proteins. But I believe the manufacturers are still under blanket immunity as this was done under the “plandemic”. Though I could be incorrect.
Can we sue those forcing the vaccine on people liable?
Can we sue the media for promoting a dangerous product?