No, Lin Wood is not confused. Burden is on the plaintiff to prove the statements he is making are knowingly false AND caused damage.
Innocent until proven guilty applies to criminal cases because your liberty is at risk.
The burden in civil court is much lower than "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Correct. Roberts or Pence would be the accusers they have to prove that Lin's information is false to claim damages … if they bring the lawsuit forward. Lin is daring them to sue him because he apparently has the information and evidence to back up his statements of defamation. If Lin is sued he gets to investigate personal items of Pence and/or Roberts to corroborate his evidence (discovery).
Whistleblower, eyewitness, documents, video, pictures, schedules, victims. Shit, I don't know what he has. Either he has something or is an exceptional bluff. Lin has celebrity and a platform he is saying some outrageous stuff about the chief justice of the supreme court and a former vice president......How long can they ignore him and let me carry on? Is this account he posting from legit?
Perhaps Lin knows the DOJ and FBI would do nothing with it. Fucking FBI has had that hard drive of Hunter's for a year. They didn't need to get it from Rudy.
I don't know what the truth is, but I have a hard time believing Lin and Sidney Powell have lost their minds, or played.
It doesn't matter if the FBI and DOJ don't do their jobs. If you have evidence, you turn it over and publicly demand a criminal investigation, like Rudy did.
They can't sue Lin because he hasn't harmed them with his accusations, and Lin knows this. Yet he keeps pushing this idea of them not suing is evidence of guilt.
Maybe he has. Maybe his info shows they already know. I have no idea. If Robert's wanted to show injury he would sue on his illegally adopted Epstein bought children's behalf. One day they may wonder if it's true.
No, Lin Wood is not confused. Burden is on the plaintiff to prove the statements he is making are knowingly false AND caused damage. Innocent until proven guilty applies to criminal cases because your liberty is at risk. The burden in civil court is much lower than "beyond a reasonable doubt."
Correct. Roberts or Pence would be the accusers they have to prove that Lin's information is false to claim damages … if they bring the lawsuit forward. Lin is daring them to sue him because he apparently has the information and evidence to back up his statements of defamation. If Lin is sued he gets to investigate personal items of Pence and/or Roberts to corroborate his evidence (discovery).
Is Lin implying that he has video?
Whistleblower, eyewitness, documents, video, pictures, schedules, victims. Shit, I don't know what he has. Either he has something or is an exceptional bluff. Lin has celebrity and a platform he is saying some outrageous stuff about the chief justice of the supreme court and a former vice president......How long can they ignore him and let me carry on? Is this account he posting from legit?
I just don’t see him bluffing with this subject
Right, so if Lin truly believes the things he is saying but is mistaken then there is no punishment for Lin and no reason to sue.
They also haven't suffered any financial harm because of Lin, so again nothing to sue for.
Lin knows that his accusations haven't harmed them in any meaningful way and they can't demand relief.
So Lin is just performing theater at this point and grifting whoever is still listening.
If he had evidence, he would have turned over copies to the DOJ and FBI and demanded an investigation, like Rudy did with Hunter's laptop.
Perhaps Lin knows the DOJ and FBI would do nothing with it. Fucking FBI has had that hard drive of Hunter's for a year. They didn't need to get it from Rudy.
I don't know what the truth is, but I have a hard time believing Lin and Sidney Powell have lost their minds, or played.
It doesn't matter if the FBI and DOJ don't do their jobs. If you have evidence, you turn it over and publicly demand a criminal investigation, like Rudy did.
They can't sue Lin because he hasn't harmed them with his accusations, and Lin knows this. Yet he keeps pushing this idea of them not suing is evidence of guilt.
Don't these accusations hurt their character and reputation as politicians? I am sure a dollar figure could be attached to that.
Maybe he has. Maybe his info shows they already know. I have no idea. If Robert's wanted to show injury he would sue on his illegally adopted Epstein bought children's behalf. One day they may wonder if it's true.
No, he would be the defendant. You are the one who has it backwards.
You arent even using the right words. Its plaintiff