Perhaps Lin knows the DOJ and FBI would do nothing with it. Fucking FBI has had that hard drive of Hunter's for a year. They didn't need to get it from Rudy.
I don't know what the truth is, but I have a hard time believing Lin and Sidney Powell have lost their minds, or played.
It doesn't matter if the FBI and DOJ don't do their jobs. If you have evidence, you turn it over and publicly demand a criminal investigation, like Rudy did.
They can't sue Lin because he hasn't harmed them with his accusations, and Lin knows this. Yet he keeps pushing this idea of them not suing is evidence of guilt.
They have to demonstrate it with factual things that have happend to them, speculation is not enough. Also it is much harder for public figures to win libel cases.
Agreed with the second statement. Accusing a public figure of illegal adoption and possibly being tied to the world's most notorious pedophile is pretty defamatory and damaging especially when he posts to all followers on social media, I think he even stole a few headlines with some of those posts. But you are probably right as Clinton just ignores it as well.
Maybe he has. Maybe his info shows they already know. I have no idea. If Robert's wanted to show injury he would sue on his illegally adopted Epstein bought children's behalf. One day they may wonder if it's true.
Perhaps Lin knows the DOJ and FBI would do nothing with it. Fucking FBI has had that hard drive of Hunter's for a year. They didn't need to get it from Rudy.
I don't know what the truth is, but I have a hard time believing Lin and Sidney Powell have lost their minds, or played.
It doesn't matter if the FBI and DOJ don't do their jobs. If you have evidence, you turn it over and publicly demand a criminal investigation, like Rudy did.
They can't sue Lin because he hasn't harmed them with his accusations, and Lin knows this. Yet he keeps pushing this idea of them not suing is evidence of guilt.
Don't these accusations hurt their character and reputation as politicians? I am sure a dollar figure could be attached to that.
They have to demonstrate it with factual things that have happend to them, speculation is not enough. Also it is much harder for public figures to win libel cases.
Agreed with the second statement. Accusing a public figure of illegal adoption and possibly being tied to the world's most notorious pedophile is pretty defamatory and damaging especially when he posts to all followers on social media, I think he even stole a few headlines with some of those posts. But you are probably right as Clinton just ignores it as well.
Maybe he has. Maybe his info shows they already know. I have no idea. If Robert's wanted to show injury he would sue on his illegally adopted Epstein bought children's behalf. One day they may wonder if it's true.