that's a California case, but it is basically saying that when considering a summary judgment you need to include any affidavits that have not been previously filed with the court can be filed and considered by the court, summary judgement is usually for when no facts are in dispute.
There are procedural outs other than summary judgment.
that's a California case, but it is basically saying that when considering a summary judgment you need to include any affidavits that have not been previously filed with the court can be filed and considered by the court, summary judgement is usually for when no facts are in dispute.
good luck and that highlighting gives me shivers
Hahahaa thank you. It’s tiny tiny font lol