50
Comments (20)
sorted by:
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
mulejuicemcquaid 2 points ago +2 / -0

GameStop? They're already dead, but the corpse has been weaponized to kill the Wall Street vultures.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Smubbs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good

4
DoubleEagle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Except, Melvin is using CNBC to lie. There is no way they covered their shorts, there simply wasn't enough volume.

CNBC used vague language to report the 5:30AM call.

3
TheBigT03 3 points ago +3 / -0

The sec should fine them for that. Is that not market manipulation??

6
DoubleEagle 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seems like market manipulation to me... but, the SEC is like the FBI. The exist to protect the status quo of criminality, not the constitution.

1
crash7863 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is interesting because........?

1
Helpus2021 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree.. why??

7
MikeObamasVeineyCock 7 points ago +7 / -0

A bunch of shit posters short squeezed a bunch of institutional investors.

1
GenericInsult 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone ELI5?

13
TaxDollarsHardAtWork [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

A hedge fund manager announced he was going to short GameStop stocks during the holiday season and the autists on r/WallStreetBets figured out that they had enough pooled resources to keep the stock from going down. This caused the hedge fund in question to become insolvent and now rich people are pissed that it happened and afraid that they'll organize to do something similar again.

6
flybyninja 6 points ago +6 / -0

It was also a naked short. Meaning they shorted more shares than the company had outstanding by around 30%. At the same time they were manipulating the market and doing behind the scenes strong arm deals to make sure GameStop tanked to bankruptcy despite having reasonable financials. Tens of thousands of jobs were on the line.

Now They literally can’t buy themselves out of this. Unlimited losses.

5
TheBigT03 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lol that is so dumb. They get what they fucking deserve.

3
TaxDollarsHardAtWork [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then their public shellacking was well-deserved.

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was also a naked short. Meaning they shorted more shares than the company had outstanding by around 30%

Couple points of clarification. A naked short has nothing to do with the number of shares. Also, when you cover the short, you buy a position that goes back to the original owner. They buy themselves out by buying the same share multiple times. The problem is that the wallstreet bets crowd isn't selling so they have to buy on low volume which is making the price insane

1
flybyninja 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes thanks for the clarification. Was trying to keep the technicalities to a minimum.

5
GenericInsult 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you for that. (And LOL)