It was also a naked short. Meaning they shorted more shares than the company had outstanding by around 30%
Couple points of clarification. A naked short has nothing to do with the number of shares. Also, when you cover the short, you buy a position that goes back to the original owner. They buy themselves out by buying the same share multiple times. The problem is that the wallstreet bets crowd isn't selling so they have to buy on low volume which is making the price insane
Couple points of clarification. A naked short has nothing to do with the number of shares. Also, when you cover the short, you buy a position that goes back to the original owner. They buy themselves out by buying the same share multiple times. The problem is that the wallstreet bets crowd isn't selling so they have to buy on low volume which is making the price insane
Yes thanks for the clarification. Was trying to keep the technicalities to a minimum.