Over the past 70 years (minimum, possibly over 100 if you include the Frankfurt School), the worlds of academia, science and politics have been taken over and co-opted by Cultural Marxism. This is a doctrine which modifies Marx's (cunt's) pre-existing theory of class warfare and transposes it between racial and sexual backgrounds instead, weighing a person's individual worth on a system where more desirable traits = biological wealth, for lack of a better analogy. White, able-bodied males are considered the bourgeoisie of Cultural Marxism, whereas black, disabled females are amongst the "poorest".

In order to level this perceived "inequality" (which crucially transcends financial and circumstantial boundaries - hence a homeless able-bodied white male is STILL considered biologically "wealthier" than a multimillionaire Muslim immigrant bound in a golden wheelchair), then society must levee "just" punishments and penalties against those who are "wealthier", all the while providing "incentives" to reduce an offender's "wealth" (i.e. the rabid promotion of LGBTQP+ propaganda these past few years).

Part of this psychological experiment includes writing a universally accepted narrative which must ALWAYS place the blame on this bourgeoisie, with no contestable viewpoints allowed.

An example of this in action: GamerGate.

For those who don't know (it was over 6 years ago now), GamerGate was a mass consumer revolt which came about after it became apparent that few of the major media outlets responsible for gaming journalism held any journalistic integrity, largely in part due to a co-ordinated astroturf campaign centred around one Zoe Quinn, an otherwise-unknown figure in the world of video games. Various evidence was compiled which suggested that Quinn was using unfair means (i.e. lip service in the most literal sense) to secure publicity for herself and her products. Discussion of the controversy was banned due to 4chan's administration being compromised by one Alex Lifschitz, so thousands of users flocked to 8chan instead. When the accused parties tried to spin the narrative that it was a hate campaign where "white male virgins" were attacking gamers of any other background, #NotYourShield popped up, proving them wrong.

However, if you were to go on Wikipedia or any other "trusted" source, you will find none of this. Instead, to them, GamerGate was a "misogynist conspiracy theory" where, for absolutely no reason at all, thousands of people decided there was nothing better to spend their days on than randomly attacking Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, and a tranny named "Brianna Wu" who in actuality was a man named John Walker Flynt who spent 10 years in University and never achieved anything, and all of this latter information has cold hard evidence to corroborate it. However, Wikipedia and the other sources maintain to this day that Wu holds multiple diplomas. Nothing but unfounded lies and ad hominem.

As it stands, there are little to no published sources which talk about GamerGate from an objective, unbiased standpoint, and the few online sources which do (e.g. Deepfreeze) are at imminent risk of disappearing. This is because of deplatforming, one of the many tools at their disposal which allows any contesting narratives to be purged and theirs to be enforced. You can't have two sides to an argument if you don't even allow the second side to present their argument in the first place.

The same thing happened with Pizzagate 2 years later. All the evidence, from the credible e-mail leaks, to the coded language, the "Kill Room", James Alefantis' own name (plus a shirt that says "I Love Children" in French), his magical disappearing tomato-growing basement, the blue Spirangle which corresponds to an FBI-documented pedophilia symbol, Obama's $65,000 hot dog delivery at a "Ping Pong Tournament", and even Laura Silsby, a FUCKING CONVICTED HUMAN TRAFFICKER, were all equally disregarded in favor of an "alt-right fever dream" headed by a close associate of one of the accused, Stephen Colbert.

And over the past 5 years, they kept doing it.

Every story the media presented, this ongoing sham pandemic included, was spun in such a way that it was usually inverse to the truth. Like their crackpot deity Crowley, they openly practise "As Above, So Below" where good becomes evil and evil becomes good.

My question is, just how long have they been doing this? Marvin Heemeyer, Joe McCarthy... who else has had untrue stories written about them in the name of Cultural Marxism?

Were Native Americans really deliberately infected with Smallpox centuries before the discoveries of Semmelweis, Ivanovsky and Leeuwenhoek were around to prove that microbiological organisms so much as existed? Possibly. The colonists were all White and the name of the game is to attack Whites at every opportunity, so you tell me.