Tonight former FBI Asst. Director Frank Figliuzzi will be doing a Zoom call with a public library to discuss (cough: promote) his new book "The FBI Way". I suggest everyone try and lodge coherent questions through the email [email protected]. I will write a list of such questions in the comments to this post.
Mr. Figliuzzi also recently when on Bill Maher's show to advocate for new federal laws criminalizing "domestic terrorism", because according to him existing laws are insufficient for putting political extremists in prison. This should be opposed by any person treasuring civil liberties regardless of other political leanings. https://twitter.com/FrankFigliuzzi1/status/1353504859941609473
The same week, Figliuzzi called on the Senate to strengthen the FBI's ability to RE-investigate White House nominees. He was responding to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's (D-RI) objection to retaining FBI Director Chris Wray who in his opinion had insufficiently scrutinized then SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh. For the record I am not a fan of either Wray or Kavanaugh based on their stances on civil liberties. But apparently Figliuzzi feels that the FBI must ruthlessly pursue federal nominees for alleged crimes that have no corroborating evidence.
Suggested questions Q1: In the 1960s and 70s the FBI used COINTELPRO in order to pursue and persecute activists of the civil rights and anti-war movement. Your bureau pursued figures like MLK and Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg in the name of "national security". Why are your new proposals legally any different from what J. Edgar Hoover was illegaly doing?
Q2: In 1954 Sen. Joseph McCarthy began hearings attacking the military as soft on communism. It has been accepted since then that these hearings were a witch hunt. In what way is the recent treatment of National Guard troops any different, since not one soldier has been demonstrated to have issued an imminent threat?
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/mccarthy-army-hearings-begin
Q4: If the FBI adopts the type of strict policing of domestic political groups that you are talking about, what has changed that will prevent federal law enforcement officers from engaging in actions that lead to the unnecessary deaths of civilians as happened at Ruby Ridge and Waco? https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a32270321/ruby-ridge-waco-miniseries-netflix/
Tonight former FBI Asst. Director Frank Figliuzzi will be doing a Zoom call with a public library to discuss (cough: promote) his new book "The FBI Way". I suggest everyone try and lodge coherent questions through the email [email protected]. I will write a list of such questions in the comments to this post.
Who is Frank Figliuzzi? This is a man who in 2019 alleged that the Trump Administration was sending secret [email protected] messages by raising the White House flag from half staff on August 8, as in 8-8 or "88" which has connotations among traditional alt-right communities. https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/08/07/msnbc_contributor_frank_figliuzzi_discovers_hidden_nazi_message_in_white_house_statement.html
Mr. Figliuzzi also recently when on Bill Maher's show to advocate for new federal laws criminalizing "domestic terrorism", because according to him existing laws are insufficient for putting political extremists in prison. This should be opposed by any person treasuring civil liberties regardless of other political leanings. https://twitter.com/FrankFigliuzzi1/status/1353504859941609473
The same week, Figliuzzi called on the Senate to strengthen the FBI's ability to RE-investigate White House nominees. He was responding to Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse's (D-RI) objection to retaining FBI Director Chris Wray who in his opinion had insufficiently scrutinized then SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh. For the record I am not a fan of either Wray or Kavanaugh based on their stances on civil liberties. But apparently Figliuzzi feels that the FBI must ruthlessly pursue federal nominees for alleged crimes that have no corroborating evidence.
Suggested questions Q1: In the 1960s and 70s the FBI used COINTELPRO in order to pursue and persecute activists of the civil rights and anti-war movement. Your bureau pursued figures like MLK and Pentagon Papers leaker Daniel Ellsberg in the name of "national security". Why are your new proposals legally any different from what J. Edgar Hoover was illegaly doing?
Q3: During the prosecution of Michael Flynn, you consistently maintained that he was guilty of collusion of some sort with Russia, and even at one point alleged that he may have been wearing a wire in order to implicate Donald Trump. Since then do you have any actual evidence that Flynn was a Russian agent, and if not do you not owe him an apology? https://mavenroundtable.io/theintellectualist/news/ex-fbi-official-suggests-michael-flynn-wore-a-wire-in-the-white-house-StndpeGr4kSUz4TQwMLCCA
Q2: In 1954 Sen. Joseph McCarthy began hearings attacking the military as soft on communism. It has been accepted since then that these hearings were a witch hunt. In what way is the recent treatment of National Guard troops any different, since not one soldier has been demonstrated to have issued an imminent threat? https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/mccarthy-army-hearings-begin
Q4: If the FBI adopts the type of strict policing of domestic political groups that you are talking about, what has changed that will prevent federal law enforcement officers from engaging in actions that lead to the unnecessary deaths of civilians as happened at Ruby Ridge and Waco? https://www.menshealth.com/entertainment/a32270321/ruby-ridge-waco-miniseries-netflix/