I guess the third option is that everyone is just really stupid. As a lot of you have noticed, according to Giuliani, there are a lot of signed affidavits suggesting election irregularities. I’ve seen people testifying to the same effect in front of the state legislatures. Contrast that with the people telling us that there is “No evidence for widespread election fraud,” who are just talking on TV. And given the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, I’m sure you’ll understand my suspicion. For example, this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=19XOFuvkL3w vs. this: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pjKXvqSNIkk If you’ll listen to Trump and Raffensperger, you get the same vibe, especially if you listen to the last 15 minutes. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_8Sn9c4xnzQ Seems odd that the media just say “no widespread election fraud” and we’re done. I know I’m preaching to the choir, but the lack of fight on the part of the Republicans is evidence that they are in on it and worse than useless.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
If the evidence were no good, at least one court would have examined it and rejected it. Instead, no court would even look at the evidence. That's a proof the evidence is good, but the leftists blocked any action based on that evidence.
UniParty Rules 🥴
It's a strange situation to have not one court look at the evidence. Lots of strange shit happening since the 6th. Why do they need troops ? I get the feeling that IF something does happen it will happen quickly.
Yeah. They’ve managed to do it in the past, like in Florida in 2000.
I've got a sneaky suspicion the voting machines assist them too... kinda like 2 kids playing with a toy. Each one gets a turn.
‘Gregory Stenstrom, a Navy veteran and forensic computer scientist, testified Wednesday before the State Senate Majority Policy Committee hearing in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, about an election process in Delaware County he described as being “forensically destructive.”’
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2020/11/26/pa-witness--usb-cards-n2580714