The only reason why i wanted a video of the quote is because of how rampant the creation of fake quotes by MSM even today when the internet exist, so why would i not assume that lots of quotes in the past are not just made up when its convenient? A lot of confession that we got from nazis are also after torture (and you would know that with torture you can make anyone say literally anything especially if you start promising stuff) I know war has a lot to do with money, but its always money to "buy" power. Rarely ever because of the country is suffering economically thus them needing to go to war. But you're using the shrinking market argument as if thats the backbone of why he "needed" to go to war. That was the only reason i threw a "tantrum".
"rather than relying on videos made long after he was dead" okay but the documentary that i linked argued about a lot of stuff and its not like they gave things that you yourself can't verify on your own. All is verifiable. So if you're interested you can check it out and then decide on your own whether its true or if its actually just nazi propaganda.
"racism was very important to his ideology which is best discovered in the books that he wrote" this would require all his "racism" to be unfounded which at the time in weimar germany is not and still is not today but not the extreme it was back then specifically in germany. I wouldn't want to debate about the context for this "racism" because its too goddamn long.
for example lets take the islamophobia that most of us here have, without a long historical context of why people here think like this, people 2-3 generations from now would think that our "racism" is just unfounded racism, but it really isn't is it? also people 2-3 generations from now wouldn't want to spend researching about 3 decades of events that can logically explain why most of us here hates islam.
It's actually just nazi propaganda. Read what Hitler himself wrote. His "shrinking markets" idea, (quite sane and correct btw) was exactly the backbone of why he NEEDED to go to war. It also put him on a very specific timetable. He NEEDED Operation Barbarossa to start no later than it did, and to conclude as he expected.
There is one reason for this: oil. "Blitzkrieg" is a bs term. It was "war of movement." It relied on FAR more oil than Germany had, or could get. Attacking USSR was all about getting oil from the caucasus, as priority one. Pretty ironic that he was right on top of oil in North 'Africa but didn't know it. He ran out of oil, and his military ran out of movement. Instead of stalling the siege of Stalingrad, that could've been focused on the Caucasus. This wouldn't have allowed Hitler to "win," but it would have made him much more of a pain in the ass.
Imagine how much oil he used up submarining to the US east coast. Then factor in the large ships out to at least Greenland. Now add in airplane fuel fighting the air war against the allies. Remove all that and focus that all on Operation Barbarossa: it's easy to see the attack wouldn't have stalled.
He killed more in Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad than in all concentration camps combined. This was by design, except he planned on killing far more. All of them, in fact. I don't think the term "genocide" existed before this? It's a special kind of evil that every German soldier participated in, knowingly. He wanted his "living space" for his supposed master race to extend to all of USSR's industrial capacity west of the Caucasus mountain range. So Stalin moved his military production farther east. Hitler thought peasants from rural areas would make better slaves than city dwellers, although he wasn't that picky about who lived or died. Everyone else in that vast expanse needed to be exterminated, which is entirely different from his "final solution" for Jews.
This is pure evil, on its face.Your favorite movie glorifies it. There are some facts in that movie, sure. satan himself includes some truth with every lie.
I'm not saying that by swallowing this lie you are yourself a soldier for Hitler. Neo nazism may be substantially different, Idk. I AM saying you should learn more about this, and Hitler's own writing is the best source of information. Mein Kampf is the usual go to as a starting point. He wrote other titles. I won't say he was either a genius nor a madman, only that the world is a better place because his ideology FAILED. Even though he may have had some ideas that were not only true, but good.
His initial success, even after going to war, was sustainable. Many debate where the point of no return was. Invading France? He could've done quite well for the German people. And for many years, he did. These are points that are largely ignored by the US population. So, there is reason to spread truth about him. He's largely misunderstood. And by extension, so is WWII.
Don't glorify nazism though. It contains too much evil.
And the "Trump is literally Hitler" schtick has no truth whatsoever. So we need to guard against nazism especially carefully.
Hitler's racism led him to conclude that genocide, over a HUGE swath of territory, was a good thing. This idea was never correct. In no way does this mean that "all his racism was unfounded." That's part of the nazi propaganda you have swallowed. No doubt the worst part. I say this because it is correctable. (And modern puke sjw bs is obviously not correct either)
The only reason why i wanted a video of the quote is because of how rampant the creation of fake quotes by MSM even today when the internet exist, so why would i not assume that lots of quotes in the past are not just made up when its convenient? A lot of confession that we got from nazis are also after torture (and you would know that with torture you can make anyone say literally anything especially if you start promising stuff) I know war has a lot to do with money, but its always money to "buy" power. Rarely ever because of the country is suffering economically thus them needing to go to war. But you're using the shrinking market argument as if thats the backbone of why he "needed" to go to war. That was the only reason i threw a "tantrum".
"rather than relying on videos made long after he was dead" okay but the documentary that i linked argued about a lot of stuff and its not like they gave things that you yourself can't verify on your own. All is verifiable. So if you're interested you can check it out and then decide on your own whether its true or if its actually just nazi propaganda.
"racism was very important to his ideology which is best discovered in the books that he wrote" this would require all his "racism" to be unfounded which at the time in weimar germany is not and still is not today but not the extreme it was back then specifically in germany. I wouldn't want to debate about the context for this "racism" because its too goddamn long.
for example lets take the islamophobia that most of us here have, without a long historical context of why people here think like this, people 2-3 generations from now would think that our "racism" is just unfounded racism, but it really isn't is it? also people 2-3 generations from now wouldn't want to spend researching about 3 decades of events that can logically explain why most of us here hates islam.
It's actually just nazi propaganda. Read what Hitler himself wrote. His "shrinking markets" idea, (quite sane and correct btw) was exactly the backbone of why he NEEDED to go to war. It also put him on a very specific timetable. He NEEDED Operation Barbarossa to start no later than it did, and to conclude as he expected.
There is one reason for this: oil. "Blitzkrieg" is a bs term. It was "war of movement." It relied on FAR more oil than Germany had, or could get. Attacking USSR was all about getting oil from the caucasus, as priority one. Pretty ironic that he was right on top of oil in North 'Africa but didn't know it. He ran out of oil, and his military ran out of movement. Instead of stalling the siege of Stalingrad, that could've been focused on the Caucasus. This wouldn't have allowed Hitler to "win," but it would have made him much more of a pain in the ass.
Imagine how much oil he used up submarining to the US east coast. Then factor in the large ships out to at least Greenland. Now add in airplane fuel fighting the air war against the allies. Remove all that and focus that all on Operation Barbarossa: it's easy to see the attack wouldn't have stalled.
He killed more in Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad than in all concentration camps combined. This was by design, except he planned on killing far more. All of them, in fact. I don't think the term "genocide" existed before this? It's a special kind of evil that every German soldier participated in, knowingly. He wanted his "living space" for his supposed master race to extend to all of USSR's industrial capacity west of the Caucasus mountain range. So Stalin moved his military production farther east. Hitler thought peasants from rural areas would make better slaves than city dwellers, although he wasn't that picky about who lived or died. Everyone else in that vast expanse needed to be exterminated, which is entirely different from his "final solution" for Jews.
This is pure evil, on its face.Your favorite movie glorifies it. There are some facts in that movie, sure. satan himself includes some truth with every lie.
I'm not saying that by swallowing this lie you are yourself a soldier for Hitler. Neo nazism may be substantially different, Idk. I AM saying you should learn more about this, and Hitler's own writing is the best source of information. Mein Kampf is the usual go to as a starting point. He wrote other titles. I won't say he was either a genius nor a madman, only that the world is a better place because his ideology FAILED. Even though he may have had some ideas that were not only true, but good.
His initial success, even after going to war, was sustainable. Many debate where the point of no return was. Invading France? He could've done quite well for the German people. And for many years, he did. These are points that are largely ignored by the US population. So, there is reason to spread truth about him. He's largely misunderstood. And by extension, so is WWII.
Don't glorify nazism though. It contains too much evil.
And the "Trump is literally Hitler" schtick has no truth whatsoever. So we need to guard against nazism especially carefully.
Hitler's racism led him to conclude that genocide, over a HUGE swath of territory, was a good thing. This idea was never correct. In no way does this mean that "all his racism was unfounded." That's part of the nazi propaganda you have swallowed. No doubt the worst part. I say this because it is correctable. (And modern puke sjw bs is obviously not correct either)