It says "a complete recount of both states would detect"
That recount needs to be of the ORIGINAL ballots.
The Georgia recount did counts of reprints from the Dominion machines. Any valid recount will have to take those machines out of the equation - they are designed for fraud.
I don't disagree, this is just what I read out of the Georgia recount. That ballots flagged for adjudication are "adjudicated", the original ballot destroyed and the new digital adjudicated ballot is the official ballot.
So as I read it, when they count the ballots, they had to print out like 170k from Dominion machines because the originals were in "error".
Yet we can't get a court to look at this or America to act on the facts...We live in Communist China/Russia
The article is great with one additional note.
It says "a complete recount of both states would detect"
That recount needs to be of the ORIGINAL ballots.
The Georgia recount did counts of reprints from the Dominion machines. Any valid recount will have to take those machines out of the equation - they are designed for fraud.
AFAIK, the machine original ballot is destroyed when it goes to adjudication. So the machine has to print out a new ballot to be counted manually.
Sounds like a built in feature for covering up fraud. I can't think of another plausible reason of why you would want to destroy the original ballot
As designed.
Like how Georgia had shredder trucks show up even though the ballots are supposed to be preserved?
If the original ballot gets destroyed they've violated federal election laws.
Original ballots are required to be held for 22 months for recount purposes.
I don't disagree, this is just what I read out of the Georgia recount. That ballots flagged for adjudication are "adjudicated", the original ballot destroyed and the new digital adjudicated ballot is the official ballot.
So as I read it, when they count the ballots, they had to print out like 170k from Dominion machines because the originals were in "error".