2816
Comments (187)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
21
d3plor4ble 21 points ago +22 / -1

Maxwell refueses to answer questions about child sex trafficking when directly confronted in court, tell's them it's "none of their business". Her lawyer agrees.

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1137.1_1_1_1.pdf

MS. McCA WLEY: This case involves sexual trafficking, sexual abuse, questions about her having interactions with other females is relevant to this case. She needs to answer these questions.

MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm instructing her not to answer.

16
Hereforagoodtime 16 points ago +16 / -0

Her fucking lawyer objected on every fucking question! I read multiple pages before I couldn't handle it anymore... Nothing of substance from Max, she denies everything and deflects questions constantly with vague answers or "I don't recall".

3
HuggableBear 3 points ago +4 / -1

Which is her right.

Which is why investigators are supposed to find evidence of the crimes that isn't dependent on her admitting to them.

Which is why nothing will come of this because the investigators are just as corrupt as the rest of them.