2816
Comments (187)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
hotCovfefeMod 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is some Q-tier self-deception. Wishing doesn't make it so.

I was never a big fan of Pence, so there's nothing hard to accept. The identity of the person of the photo has been confirmed.

1
Awakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it hasn’t. I’m a professional illustrator and computer artist with thirty years of professional experience and forty years over all. It’s the same guy. All the markers around the eyes, nose, mouth line up. On top of that, hairline, chin and jaw are the same. I have no idea why you’re defending him, but that’s the same guy.

And yes, ALL of DC is compromised. Only a complete idiot or shill would disagree with that at this point. Which means I’m wasting my time.

1
hotCovfefeMod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Simmer down, friend. I've never placed my faith in politicians. It's a good baseline from which to operate. So I'm not disagreeing with you in principle, and I'm not defending anyone.

That photo is verifiably false. There are items in the full crop of it that didn't exist until the present era. (This is why I don't hire graphics designers to do forensic work.)

Don't fall for the fake news, man...

On the other hand, if your goal is to get me to do a bunch of searches about a gay porn star, you succeeded. Well-trolled.

1
Awakened 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s why the gay porn industry pays me the big bucks.

Also, that’s him. If you have any evidence, I would love to hear it, but there is nothing in that photo that didn’t exist back then. They had shirts that showed nipples back then just like today.

I’m saying I saw and have the pic and that’s him. You saying deboonked is not gonna play at this site.

I respectfully ask you to show me the evidence that the pic I’m looking at wasn’t taken of Pence in the glorious glory hole 80s. If you don’t have anything but empty statements then...

Well done. You successfully wasted my time. Which is what shills are literally paid to do.

Really, I would love to see your evidence that the outfits and walls I’m looking at didn’t exist in the 80s. I’m well over 50, maybe even 60 if I’m being completely honest, so I would love to know what your referencing.

Pence is just another compromised blackmailed traitor. Dime a dozen. The sad part is, I could give a shit if he liked the cock. That’s his business. I guess the other pics are much worse. Probably young boys like that Mormon.

2
hotCovfefeMod 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://imgur.com/a5DnmwI

Molded disposable plastic bottling wasn't constructed that way in the 1980s. Denim distressing was really different in the 80s. Commercial signage printing was vastly different then what you see there. If you want to compare years of relevant professional experience I'll compare favorably on two of those three items to however many years a lifelong graphic designer brings to the table.

No empty statements there.

I'm guessing someone steeped in 80s gay porn trivia could point out a number of other things we'd probably both rather not know.

The only thing I'm arguing is that the photo isn't what you're saying it is. There are a lot of similarities between the two faces if you try to calculate age-related differences in your head, but check out photos of young Mike Pence and it further crumbles pretty quickly.

To be clear, I'm not even discussing Pence, whether he is or isn't compromised, is or isn't a closeted homosexual, all of that is just tangential and unrelated noise to my point: that isn't him in the photo.

But if you're intent on finding premises to justify your foregone conclusions, then carry on.

Spez: If you want to really earn your keep, the name of that person is probably readily available and you can do all the facial analysis your heart desires. But that's well above my pay grade.