posted ago by WildCape +7 / -0
[The Uneasy Afterlife of “A Confederacy of Dunces”](https://www.newyorker.com/books/second-read/the-uneasy-afterlife-of-a-confederacy-of-dunces?utm_campaign=falcon&utm_brand=tny&utm_medium=social&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=facebook&mbid=social_facebook&fbclid=IwAR2t_osVAy9VlyDCGp-brTGLL4SAHn0tHBtJokBE22vkeBaixeXNqYEHKtA)
Comments (5)
sorted by:
5
Yourhearse 5 points ago +5 / -0

I must revisit this book, I still have the copy I read over twenty years ago.

3
TownesVanCamp 3 points ago +3 / -0

I find Ignatius to be an unlikable southern hipster fellow.

2
queenicarius 2 points ago +2 / -0

John Kennedy Toole brought Ignatius to life. His immersion into the character in the first 50 pages was so intense that it left me feeling like I needed a shower. I grew up in New Orleans at that time and have been recommending this book for decades.

1
TownesVanCamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn’t say it was a bad book. I didn’t pass judgement on Toole’s writing ability. In fact I’d say my comment on Ignatius is a compliment. Ignatius was intentionally unlikeable. Toole wrote the hipster king well before there were hipsters.

2
otistoole 2 points ago +2 / -0

This