Just wondering.. I looked at the image URL in the OAN video and something occurred to me... he's got bunches of times and precincts that match on ratio. This would be mathmatically impossible, but two things stick out:
First, He's allowed to cherry pick what times and what precincts are together. So there are anomolies not fitting this pattern he simply left out.
Still seems fishy though, to have that many that DO match, it is unlikely.. except..
Where did he get the data? Is it edison timeseries? Because if it is, edison didn't report raw numbers through the count. They only released vote total and a ratio to 2 significant digits. It was up to the news programs to interpret the numbers from there.
So, if every time series slice is reduced to a resolution of 2 significant digits, your chances of having collisions like this go up.
Great thoughtful comment. This comment illustrates why conservatives win virtually any fair argument - because we are happy to subject our analysis to thoughtful criticism by others. Imagine if the courts, MSM, etc. actually asked intelligent questions like redpillschool.
Just wondering.. I looked at the image URL in the OAN video and something occurred to me... he's got bunches of times and precincts that match on ratio. This would be mathmatically impossible, but two things stick out:
First, He's allowed to cherry pick what times and what precincts are together. So there are anomolies not fitting this pattern he simply left out.
Still seems fishy though, to have that many that DO match, it is unlikely.. except..
Where did he get the data? Is it edison timeseries? Because if it is, edison didn't report raw numbers through the count. They only released vote total and a ratio to 2 significant digits. It was up to the news programs to interpret the numbers from there.
So, if every time series slice is reduced to a resolution of 2 significant digits, your chances of having collisions like this go up.
How much? Hard to say.
Great thoughtful comment. This comment illustrates why conservatives win virtually any fair argument - because we are happy to subject our analysis to thoughtful criticism by others. Imagine if the courts, MSM, etc. actually asked intelligent questions like redpillschool.