4472
Comments (125)
sorted by:
114
rockettails 114 points ago +114 / -0

Audit the Fed.

45
Donger-Lord2 45 points ago +45 / -0

It’s going to be so funny seeing Melvin beg Biden for a bailout. He’s going to suck his tiny cock.

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
12
Patriot_Lettuce 12 points ago +12 / -0

There's gonna be no bailout money after the "Coid Relif" Bill passed this month. We had to send billions to other countries for gender studies programs.

hehe

Biting them in the ass now. Get fucked elites!

16
Donger-Lord2 16 points ago +17 / -1

Yes there will, they will just pint more money and increase the deficit even more.

8
Patriot_Lettuce 8 points ago +8 / -0

They can't print this much money fast enough. They're fucked.

13
Hunter1970 13 points ago +13 / -0

They don't actually print money, they push a button and it manifests on a screen.

5
Patriot_Lettuce 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is true, but they have speed limits. Not that they can't just digitally "print" 10 trillion in an instant, but they can't, cuz it'd wake too many people up. Which is the thing they fear the most.

6
Hunter1970 6 points ago +6 / -0

70% of all dollars in existence manifested in the last year and my parents still voted Biden.

5
Donger-Lord2 5 points ago +5 / -0

I want the fed to collapse.

2
caKAG 2 points ago +2 / -0

And while the printer machine goes Burr it will be time to buy Bitcoin

4
EtTuRINOs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Federal reserve goes brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

2
Patriot_Lettuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can't go brrrrrrt fast enough to save them. Hehehe

3
EtTuRINOs 3 points ago +4 / -1

They've cut the losses hard today by having various day trading apps halt the purchase of stocks, all while the hedge funds are fully capable of trying to sell. Lots of stocks selling with no buyers drops value. They'll still lose money but nowhere near as much.

The lawsuits will hurt a bit, but it'll be less painful to them than if regular trading continued.

It's like companies having to pay 25 million dollars on a faulty product, but made 100 million selling the faulty product. They still made money, just not as much after the lawsuit. They're fine with that. Long prison sentences though....

2
Patriot_Lettuce 2 points ago +3 / -1

This is totally inaccurate.

3
EtTuRINOs 3 points ago +3 / -0

How so?

2
pbarnett865 2 points ago +2 / -0

They've never been afraid of debt when it's for their handlers.

4
EtTuRINOs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Melvin doesn't need to beg Biden for anything. He's a stooge and a puppet.

This is the part that irritates me with this whole thing. People are talking about government action and more regulation.... the government is already corrupt, why the hell do people think that politicians, who are already bought off, are now going to hold their puppet masters to the fire?

In what clown world do people live in that think the government doesn't already want to protect these companies that pay them and make them rich under the table?

17
Joesf23 17 points ago +18 / -1

Get rid of it. 1913 was when we became a corporation owned by the central banks. It has been a shitshow ever since

7
dianabrown1 7 points ago +7 / -0

100% correct

16
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 16 points ago +16 / -0

Audits do nothing, as we've seen from auditing the elections.

I used to say end it, but we're in so fucking deep. Trump had a shot. If it was ended under Biden, I guarantee the outcome would be even worse.

9
Dictator_Bob 9 points ago +9 / -0

There is no chance that the people who control the White House under the name "Biden" would work towards an audit. This has nothing to do with an actual audit or demanding we get a full audit of the federal reserve system, it's board, and Fort Knox gold reserves.

We deserve an audit, it has popular support. The only ones in opposition now are those who benefit from defrauding the American people. These are the same people who own the corporate media complex. As more people detach from this system of products the better chance we have of ending this fraud.

7
americafirst1337 7 points ago +7 / -0

Remember when Janet Yellen told a congressman it would be a bad idea to audit the fed because it would make the fed political because the fed would be held publicly responsible for making bad decisions, which would prevent it from acting independently. Essentially people would get mad at us for fucking over the country and try to stop us from doing it, but we don’t care about what you peasants think. Such an evil, ugly bitch.

3
dianabrown1 3 points ago +3 / -0

It'll never happen. We have abtter chance at departing from the FED and creating an all together different monitary system. Then, slavery will end.

42
tombombadil86 42 points ago +42 / -0

Speaking fees and book deals are just bribery.

18
entropy 18 points ago +18 / -0

Came here to say exactly this. Could it not be more obvious? Who the fuck is going to pay them half a million dollars for 30-60 minutes were it not for a pay back or future guarantee? It's ridiculous.

6
Stable 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm counting nearly $1 million from Citadel alone, the company that's bailing out Melvin Capital. And it's believed that the pressure for all of these companies dropping the ability to buy GME is coming from the SEC. For the billions at stake, the money is peanuts.

10
infowarlord 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah. 270k for delivering a speech? Pretty obvious the speech is not what they were buying.

2
robin_hood 2 points ago +2 / -0

can confirm

2
dianabrown1 2 points ago +2 / -0

correct

24
MeMargie 24 points ago +24 / -0

Whereas we can thrown in Facebook Jail for speaking the truth?

3
JoinTheDiscussion 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can't be thrown in FaggotBook jail if you're not on there to begin with.. FUCK THEM!!

19
roadster14 19 points ago +19 / -0

25 & 49 Citadel...4 times in October 2020, just a few months ago, and one in October 2019.

Citadel being the ones pulling the strings with Robinhood. Robinhood being the most popular trading platform on WSB for beginners. Hmm.

17
FloydFanatics99 17 points ago +17 / -0

And Citadel is on the list too, ofc it is

8
StaroftheSea 8 points ago +8 / -0

And look how much they paid her!

16
4
BiteMeMarxist 4 points ago +4 / -0

how about a tl/dr... ?

5
Truthdose 5 points ago +5 / -0

speed up x2

14
FredRedd 14 points ago +14 / -0

I think you meant to say, "C'mon WO-MAN!"

6
IncredibleMrE1 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's MA'AM!

11
Dictator_Bob 11 points ago +11 / -0

This is a public record of bribery. Is it not?

5
Transfer [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Laws don't apply to the rich and powerful. C'mon man!

2
FliesTheFlag 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know, the Thing!

8
subaru 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder what else she does with that mouth - what kind of hmmm do you have to have to get that kind of cash????

7
WindyCityBluez 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's obvious kick backs. You think that 75 million for Pakistan gender studies really is going for That? It will be laundered back to the people that sponsored the bill. Us tax payers are being played.

5
highenergywinning 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thats the case with every omnibus bill.

2
residue69 2 points ago +2 / -0

CODEL trips are where they bring their family members to act as the bag men to pick up the loot.

6
aconcernedtroll 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wonder if these speeches are really just insider trading tips...

We should look into big moves made by the speech recipients shortly after her speeches.

6
Annpi 6 points ago +6 / -0

18 Texas Christain University. Wonder who the hell paid for that.....

5
KekistanPM 5 points ago +5 / -0

Janet Felon.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
JoeBidenEatsBabies 4 points ago +4 / -0

But did you know that she is the first female in that position? /s

2
Transfer [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am FURIOUs that it wasn't a black woman! fucking racists!

1
infowarlord 1 point ago +1 / -0

What we really could have used is an all-tranny cabinet.

2
dianabrown1 2 points ago +2 / -0

.....and thats important? COME ON MAN!

4
VA_MAGApede 4 points ago +4 / -0

She’s part of the problem, easy Fed money is what has brought this about. Used to have morale hazard, but no more at least not for the big shots

4
DudePlayingaDude 4 points ago +4 / -0

That commie whore

4
gamingthisandthat 4 points ago +4 / -0

And now shes regulating GME and other stocks?

3
Susurro 3 points ago +3 / -0

$270,000 for a speech!? Fuck that. Crony bribes is what that is.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Transfer [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

She'll circle back to you on that

3
PewPew_ThaDuK 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's going to be like any other Democrat scam. They will fix the problem by limiting you

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
MajorClark 3 points ago +3 / -0

Those overpaid so called speaking engagements is money laundered.

3
QueMalaHarris 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who the fuck would pay that much to listen to this bitch speak? I swear these motherfuckers have gone insane. I can’t imagine what Obama must charge to speak

2
AllTheWayTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lots of fees from same company. How many speeches does she need to give to same company. Looks like some payoffs of some kind.

2
Prometheus76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Money laundering, kids! This is how it works. Another major one: book deals. They pay upfront royalties of $X million dollars. Never expect to make that revenue back on book. Hire shitty ghost writer to churn out drivel. Sell it everywhere (and the extras all end up in Costco). File as a loss for IRS purposes. EVERYONE IS HAPPY.

2
GuacamoleTariff 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fed is now part of the treasury. Welcome to communist America.

1
HaHawk 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're also taking ownership of small businesses by saddling them with new debt, using money created out of thin air

Cool trick, Yellen! Wanna bring it to the white house?

2
JigglesV 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel like mace windu in revenge of the sith when i think of these crooks

Hes too dangerous to be kept alive

2
impera 2 points ago +2 / -0

So with the understanding that bribing regulators is probably illegal, if you time-shift things about a bit and bribe people before they become a regulator, is that still a crime? There is still a quid pro quo in play.

Maybe regulators shouldn't be picked from a pool of people that have the stink of organised crime following them around like a miasma? Or do normal random people have money thrown at them inexplicably for no apparent reason? Maybe that ought invalidate the appointment?

In the history of nation collapses, civil wars, massive death, empty shelves and deprivation and disease, unrests and burning and instability... looting of assets by the people 'in the know' always precedes the collapse. And is a large part of what causes the collapse, correlation and causation both.

2
kamalashugebutthole 2 points ago +2 / -0

$7.3 million in BRIBES. They're called bribes.

2
CL1984 2 points ago +2 / -0

Revolving door of the swamp but don't you dare try to make some money on a trade against a hedge fund.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MrQuacker2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

What speech is worth $225k?????

2
Rockhad10 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need Jesus

2
bigrex64 2 points ago +2 / -0

she's the bitch who never raised the interst rate while Obummer was president. Raised it 4 times on trump on 18 months.....swamp rat.

2
Light_HIV_Effect 2 points ago +2 / -0

They make their money on bullshit speaking fees and book tours written by other people.

2
Transfer [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Clinton™ way

1
dianabrown1 1 point ago +1 / -0

absolutely correct ..then check out Baby and daddy Bush. Go ahead, it'll make sense to you once you see all the pay for play in the numbers.

2
Nadlers_Diaper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Makes more for one speaking appearance than most people make in a year. I could give the same speech for $300 and a boxed lunch.

2
SomeoneInHouston 2 points ago +2 / -0

She is making BANK! Wow. What easy money!

2
Ocineaa 2 points ago +2 / -0

This should surprise nobody at this point. That's how demonrats enrich themselves.

2
TenScoops 2 points ago +2 / -0

SOMEONE with aReddit account, please go post this to /rcryptocurrency

with title "This cunt wants to regulate your Bitcoin, Dogecoin, Ethereum"

2
Sgt-Pepper1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fat-Assed globalist talking monkey.

1
dianabrown1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats what the game is all about Transfer. Go seek out William Jefferson Clinton and his speaking fees. Then tell me who in their right mind would even consider paying these people this kind of money? Well, Ill tell you, those paying for influence, certainty not the words of the speech. You get it now? Yeah, I know its sick but thats the way its been and will continue to be until we the people stop it. We can, you know.

1
Magastreammedia 1 point ago +1 / -0

TIAA? 😖

1
BidenTouchedMe 1 point ago +1 / -0

270k to have a virtual nobody in the scheme of public speakers. Definitely not a kick back or quid pro quo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
remindmelater 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speaking fees?...Isn't that the same as kickbacks?....just asking.....

1
Nowanoutlaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they have shut down outsider trading for game stop. So a hedge fund caught holding naked shorts that got punished by outsiders is now committing insider trading. Any other rules they want to break? No matter the outcome they have exposed the fraud to anyone that is paying attention. Just like the election its gonna be all assets deployed. Just like the grasshoppers in the movie ants. They are going to do what ever it takes to keep the illusion alive.

1
PlateOwner 1 point ago +1 / -0

1% "Speaking fee"

99% "Be nice to us when you work for the big guy."

1
Freedom4545 1 point ago +1 / -0

what a fucking joke amount of money for some bureaucrat to stand and speak.